handfuloflight

> Like with humans there is plenty of employment for people with below genius level IQ's.

Not if the genius level IQs take the market share.

You have access to Argon?

I would venture the fate of the bygone shares would be the same as those 15,625. Sold early. Paperhands (aren't most of us?).

Sounds good on latency but how is its actual decision quality vs. Jev?

You need skin in the game, kiddo.

This just translates to "anyone paying a margin on anything anywhere is a sucker."

You're definitely a sucker too, probably multiple times over.

I literally only had to have my eyes skim 3 words ("the important part") to know this was written by LLM.

What did you notice?

How long can OpenCode bleed for?

It's worth stating why, and depends what seams you're pulling at this sitting.

You'll be ready for the third grade soon enough!

Write and we shall read.

If expecting more from others is what gives someone a sense of superiority, then what is that you're doing with your expectations?

Next time, Google it or ask ChatGPT. That's what elementary kids do when they don't know something.

What do you think about this? https://claude.ai/share/54eef6b8-b702-4f3e-968c-b19184e951f4

How does this translate to coding performance, which is what most of HN cares about (...I assume)?

So if you don't know what CI is, what does "I am someone in tech", mean? Marques Brownlee probably doesn't know CI is, but he's also in tech. Because if you by mean "I am in tech" that "I am a software engineer", and you don't know what CI is, then boy; I'd be worried for you.

Your presumption is not my intention, I simply felt too lazy to add anything else.

How does your criticism relate to the specifics of what OP posted? https://github.com/google/ax/blob/main/docs/concepts.md#work... This says it has skill registries.

Remember specifics, keep going.

> This plus the memory issues make dreams of long horizon agents, that could plausibly handle changing specifications, quite implausible with current architectures.

Any reason why that can't be solved through context management and keep-forward scaffolding?

Updated to the original title. My error was assuming the forced floor vote meant impeachment would happen. No intent to misrepresent.

I made multiple points, you were unable to respond to them. Copy and paste what I said into your favorite AI chatbot to help you parse it on your level.

I did not know men could build such things.

Lieutenant @dang?

Yes, you couldn't find a coherent argument or position to rebut with.

If they charged for the weights up front, then your critique would simply reverse.

Exactly, so your analogy is useless.

Analogy doesn't apply to this case, as you are paying for the chair upfront but not paying for the model weights upfront.

How is it not obvious and fair that they are asking you to pay them when you see success (defined as >100K MAU)? How more aligned can you and them be besides this?

This guy gets it.