handfuloflight

With Reddit, at least it's the legal agreement you enter into them by creating an account and using it.

What exactly is a microVM?

Polar prohibits: Human services (custom development, design and consultancy).

Is this the case with Flowglad? We have a SaaS with a monthly team seat fee + usage fees, but we also offer a bespoke service where we may bill per hour or bill per project (for work done and delivered inside of the SaaS). So these would be higher ticket.

Would you support this?

This is great! Where does the Stripe Connect process happen, I'm not seeing it in the dashboard?

Any plans on building the Stripe Connect features?

Is your pricing ON TOP of what Stripe charges? Are we bringing our Stripe API Key to this?

End of an era.

The experimental part is that he's Brown and Muslim.

It can do that today. I am doing that today.

Then you're missing the point of my rebuttal. You say submarines don't swim [like fish] despite both moving through water, the only distinction is mechanism. Can AI recursively create new capabilities like thinking does, or just execute tasks like submarines do? That's the question.

Swimming and thinking being 'human capabilities' doesn't preclude them from also being solutions to evolutionary problems: aquatic locomotion and adaptive problem solving, respectively.

And pointing out that we're in a 'semantic debate' while simultaneously insisting on your own semantic framework (capabilities vs solutions) is exactly the move you're critiquing.

What an oversimplification. Thinking computers can create more swimming submarines, but the inverse is not possible. Swimming is a closed solution; thinking is a meta-solution.

It's a known issue among us Claudemasters.

And in case it needs to be said, I'm not using Hacker News as a wholesale bookmarking service (my frequency of link submissions is testament to that), only for links I think would interest this community. I believed a look into the entrepreneurial history of a marginalized community in America would be exactly that.

I thought the audience of this website would have the base level of education such that if I had expected this response, I wouldn't have posted it.

That being said, the Wikipedia page definitely needs work.

No. I will continue to. What's your problem?

And it's ironic your account is from 2008 and you don't know that's exactly how Hacker News started, a del.icio.us inspired, social link bookmarking service.

That's why when you click submit there's a message on the bottom thats reads:

"You can also submit via bookmarklet." Which if you click: https://news.ycombinator.com/bookmarklet.html, speaks about adding a shortcut to your browser toolbar so....

so...

so...

so you can bookmark via Hacker News.

Who is the racist? I use my Hacker News account as a way to bookmark things, if you have a problem with that, take it up with the moderators.

Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Negro-Business-Booker-T-Washington/dp...

> The Negro In Business is a book written by Booker T. Washington, a prominent African American leader and educator, that explores the history and current state of black entrepreneurship in the United States. The book discusses the challenges faced by black business owners, including discrimination, lack of access to capital and resources, and limited opportunities for education and training. Washington also highlights the successes of black entrepreneurs, including their contributions to the economy and their role in building stronger communities. Through personal anecdotes and statistical analysis, Washington offers a comprehensive overview of the state of black business in America at the time of the book's publication in 1907. The book serves as a valuable historical document and a testament to the resilience and determination of black entrepreneurs in the face of adversity.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

I can feel when this fluid hasn't properly flushed.

frankensteinian

I mean, it is a very odd movie. It wasn't marketed at all and the production and overall atmosphere feel more like a movie with less than 1/20th of the stated budget. Like an obscure cable TV thing.

Would have been better investing $5M each in 20 new promising directors.

I'm sure there's already a significant overlap.

He's probably estimating the cost to produce these, after the fact.

Too bad that's not how much they spent on that all of that, though.

Here's a hint. What goes inside the inference engine is an array. You control that array every time you call for inference.

You're describing the classic developer dopamine loop, just faster now.

Spinning up test after test, tweaking parameters, chasing that "it works!" high, that's what debugging has always been.

You're doing the exact same thing with your code that you're criticizing him for doing with AI. Same sunk cost fallacy ("I've already spent 3 hours, might as well get it working"), same illusion of control, same "I'm on a roll" feeling when the tests finally pass.

The only difference is speed. He gets micro-hits every 10 seconds watching tokens stream. You get them every time you re-run your test suite. Same gambling structure, same reward circuit lighting up, you've just normalized yours because it happened slowly enough to not look like a slot machine.

And you're the one reducing it to "gambling" unless you're claiming human developers experience zero dopamine and write code with omniscient correctness the first time. If they don't, if there's iteration, failure, reward, then you're describing the same neurochemistry. You've just decided it only counts as "gambling" when it makes you uncomfortable.

Pricing?

What do we build now to reap the coming of the messianic era?

Sora, show me this.

I actually found in my case that is just self inertia in not wanting to break through cognitive plateaus. The AI helped you with a breakthrough hence the magic, but you also did something right in your constructing of the context in the conversation with the AI; ie. you did thought and biomechanical[1] work. Now the dazzle of the AI's output makes you forget the work you still need to do, and the next time you prompt you get lazy, or you want much more, for much less.

[1] (moving your eyes, hands, hearing with your ears. etc)

Google Chrome: Dangerous site Attackers on the site you tried visiting might trick you into installing software or revealing things like your passwords, phone, or credit card numbers. Chrome strongly recommends going back to safety. Learn more about this warning