handfuloflight

It's a good model ser.

"it can do everything Claude code can do" This is a tad bit hyperbolic.

You can't vibecode your way to their market capture.

Would be nice for Zed to announce something that was immediately available for use.

This is a great idea.

Beautiful! Looking forward to the Kickstarter. But also, why is it completely flat?

For example, OpenCode says they have a ZDR with DeepSeek. Some of us are skeptical that's going to be properly honored. There's no way to know.

But in the thousands can pencil out if you're saying tens of thousands over calling the frontier models, no?

What are the costs to train and use the Tinker models?

Okay here's one of the outputs:

> Before you start, make sure that your AWS credentials are correct. If they are not, S3 rejects the upload with a permission error.

Wouldn't it be better to write:

Before start, ensure AWS credentials are correct. Otherwise, S3 rejects uploads with permission error.

Do you mean if other providers will cut their prices in turn?

I definitely think you want the genius model to synthesize everything that rolls up to them.

Does it store memory so future sessions are bootstrapped with necessary context? Looks great though!

On first glance, it just looks (the features) like a clone of GitHub. Why not provide us the differentiators, what problems it solves (especially for engineering teams with agentic labor) that GitHub doesn't?

The person running a food truck business necessarily has to be the one that cooks?

It is not strange at all given their business is spend management and likely a significant portion of their customers spend on inference and would like that spend to be... managed.

This is more about automated long horizon work.

> To test that progress, we returned to a task the old swarm had struggled with: building SQLite from scratch, in Rust, from nothing but its documentation.

Isn't SQLite's source code in its training data?

What, exactly, is unserious?

According to this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/kimi/comments/1uyizup/comment/oy0vt...

Fable is impressed.

What about people who genuinely write their own articles but due to their time spent with AI, they are sounding like AI? I know people like this. They really are writing like that now. Shouldn't there be fairness to them?

Works now.

That's not working either.

The website is down?

Then your art is clearly about not carrying about usability. Nobody who is principled in editorial design for the web would ship this.

It's what someone who's trying to be "artsy" thinks "artsy" is. I'm not straining to read it.

Why have you put all the content on the right column like this on desktop.

Better spent on a $200 OpenAI or Anthropic sub and having their top models give you instant, personalized teaching.

What are your thoughts on how design changes if writes become much heavier, ie. when recording agent operations?