hamper653

Or are they?

Not every word in a conversation needs to be useful.

There can’t be evidence if there is neither a crime nor an investigation.

> yards, large homes, greater privacy than apartments provide

Really? You don’t even have hedges around your yards.

But did they? Was there an actual investigation going on?

> At this point, people should buy a burner phone when going to/from the US.

At this point? This has been standard practice for a while now.

> He was charged for destroying evidence, not refusing a search

Evidence with regard to which investigation?

It has been standard practice for some time now in some European companies.

> if anything

That’s the crux of the matter, isn’t it? If there was no suspicion whatsoever, hence no investigation, then he couldn’t possibly obstruct it.

> destruction of records in federal investigations

There was a federal investigation going on?

> even if they had no reason for suspicion

Are you sure about that?

> knowingly

Did he know he was suspected of something? Was he suspected of something?

> when it comes to the authorities thinking you did something wrong

Did they though? Was there an actual investigation going on?

Evidence of what?

Obstruction to what though?

There is a difference between exploding a bomb and deleting your data. One is a crime.

> Let me explain: if an event or behaviour affects a person, it means that there must be a physical record of it.

That record needn’t be inside individual brain cells.

1,400 live streams.......... :|

1,400 live streams, Japan... :D

Soviet Union did a fair amount of damage to the environment being a capitalist country.

I would like F to be inserted in the middle of the weekend, not at the end of it.

> A distinctly Western European perspective.

Well, "civilisation" is a Western European word for a Western European concept.

Is it though? Desiring such an end state sounds pretty stupid to me.

But not-very-bright evil people can’t?

Indeed.

Bezos doesn’t mind you thinking that the system is flawed and rigged and incentives bad behaviour.

Bezos is happy as long as you don’t abolish private property.

I mean, Americans have consistently elected these people, haven’t they? This is easy to mask as "evil", but…

In French. "End of week" would be "fin de semaine" but we don’t say that, we say "weekend". Which is understood as these two days when most people don’t work.

If anything, "fin de semaine" would refer to the last working days before the weekend.

Bezos doesn’t want you to abolish private property.

If you believe it possible to build a company that serves real humans rather than the accumulation of capital and the extractive nature of corporations, you will try that instead.

Yeah, and these ♥genuinely-caring♥ capitalists always end up either bankrupt, or Bezos.

> I don’t believe that.

Of course not. Bezos is spending a lot to make sure you don’t.