It's a bit of a cacophony, but it got me through grad school!
1,106 karma · joined October 21, 2016
It's a bit of a cacophony, but it got me through grad school!
I seem to remember that during the Crimea invasion, Russian used a similar tactic: they used sigint to find Ukrainian cell phone signals of soldiers hiding in the forests, tipping off the defenders’ locations.
Since it boots to desktop in 10-15 seconds I don’t have to deal with the overnight power issues everyone complains about. And since it doesn’t run a hundred automatic background processes it’s much quicker to start working than my MBP was.
Printing on the other hand…
A big aspect of Marxism is that labor has been alienated from their production in the age of industrialization, so I’d say it’s been a thing for a while.
But I ended up googling it and sort of wish I didn’t ask the question.
https://www.theawl.com/2016/04/if-you-give-a-mouse-a-heart-a...
The author doesn’t mention that his article is the latest in a long line of “bubble’s about to pop” articles that have been steadily written since around 2014. Sure the stock market is in a bubble. But I would be sad if I had spent the last 8 years waiting for it to pop.
It feels weird to start work on Monday and get off on Tuesday. idk how we’ll deal with words like “tomorrow”.
Edit: i guess night shift people deal with it. But having worked night shift I can’t help but remember that time really revolves around the dayshift workers. “Tomorrow” to your night shift peers meant one thing, but to the world at large I always was explicit with which day I was referring to.
But if they accepted lightning payments, I would pay them in BTC.
A related question: when a password system tells me I need to change my password, and it has to differ by 3 letters from my previous password, is that system storing my password text rather than the hash of the password? Is that safe?
Privacy.com is free, but I’d pay quite a bit of money for it, it has saved me hundreds of dollars.
In most cases, the target company's stock rises because the acquiring company pays a premium for the acquisition, in order to provide an incentive for the target company's shareholders to approve the takeover. Simply put, there's no motive for shareholders to greenlight such action if the takeover bid equates to a lower stock price than the current price of the target company. [1]
If the buying firm doesn’t need approval from the Class A shareholders, what would be their incentive to buy those Class A stocks at a premium?