683 karma · joined October 31, 2013
UK Government: Mañana
Reporter/EU Official: ¿En Español?
UK Government: Sí, en Español.
Reportero / Oficial de la UE: ¿Cuándo va a desencadenar el artículo 50 ya?
UK Government: Mañana.
Reportero / Oficial de la UE: ¿Mañana?
UK Government: Sí, Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnyaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaa.
Reportero / Oficial de la UE: Ah, sí. Mañana.
We're going through the same technology change with mobiles now, but that even seems to be tapering off now.
Vexatious behaviour is not tolerated in the courts here; most of the time.
I love trying get to the PPI callers to explain to me what bank accounts, insurance, credit cards are, finally saying that I might have had a bank account, or credit card, then try to get them to explain to me what the PPI is. I had a guy on the phone for about 40 minutes one day while I was waiting for the ferry.
The best thing you can do is get connected to a human as quickly as possible, so you can soak the call.
The other day I didn't really have time to take one of these calls, but I pressed 3 to be connected to someone, and left the phone. After about 5 minutes of being on hold, leaving the phone off the hook, I then heard someone going hello for about 2 minutes.
Another tactic I have is to claim some interest, but that I have to call them back as I am changing phone numbers/jobs/houses, or that I don't have time in the next few weeks, but when I find a moment I will call them back. I refuse to give a 'good time to call' because I am so busy, but when I have a moment I will return the call. This is an amusing tactic because most of the they claim they can only make outgoing calls, and that I will have to give them a time. I generally suggest that them must have an incoming phone number for other purposes, so surely they could give me that number. Usually they decline, so then finally I try to get the persons phone number on the other end of the call. They generally say that is their private number number, to which I say that this my private number, so it really would be quite fair for me to contact them on their 'personal' number.
This seriously works, as I only get one call every month or two. I have also gotten a bit of a reputation at work for these types of calls and my co-workers have not end of amusement that I engage with these callers in this way.
These calls are using an anti-pattern of most people who are disinterested will hang up, but those who are interested will continue to talk to the person.
Their economic model depends on uninterested parties hanging up as quickly as possible. To disrupt their economics, take their call.
I know things are a bit different in the US and Canadia where the mobile/cell call receiver also pays for minutes. Here in the UK, and the rest of Europe, only the call initiator pays for the call. If you are calling from a land you will pay a higher rate to call a mobile (an 07 number).
My approach is a little different than to hang-up as quickly as possible, as this is a behaviour that the telephone solictors use to their advantange. In short, I try to soak a call for as long as possible. The best tactic is to be a little bit dumb, but fean interest in whatever the person is calling about. I generally find that getting them to explain each sentance they say about 3 times is about right, before moring on to the next sentance.
Anyway, I answer all calls, and press the button to talk to a human, then try to keep the human on the line for as long as possible.
The cost centre for these automated calls is for a human to talk to me. On at least 4 occasions after being an affible fool for about 20 minutes, without the sales person on the other end, they have said "okay, I get it, you don't want us to call you, and we will put you on our 'do not call list'". At which time they promptly hang up in a huff.
I my numbers, work, cottage/holiday home, mobile, work mobile, and work line now only get about 1 call a month, of which I am more than happy to take, and generally ends with the above result. Previously I used to get 4 or so random unknown calls a day.
I also notice that after calling for a taxi, the number of unwanted calls goes up.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/cab-medallion-own...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2014/09/08/wish-yo...
It could have been a lot worse.
The babyboomers did not start running things until the 1980's, and they are definitely not responsible for very many social services, but I would agree that they did help facilitate a more tolerant view of minorities, and that is something to be commended, but that doesn't negate the their overarching negative impact on just about every other social program: housing, education, healthcare, immigration, out-of-work benefits, disability benefits. All of these have been massively cutback over "their" tenure, so they could cut taxes for themselves, during their most productive and prosperous years, so they can continue live their extravagant lifestyles.
The babyboomers are a disgrace to what their parents and grandparents did and stood for.
Obamacare is a positive development in the USA, but there have been massive (public) healthcare cuts (in relative terms) in every other country with a modern economy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_P._Huntington https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Daiches
Our infrastructure is crumbling, our young are getting poorer and poorer education and we are told we can not afford these public services as tax receipts go down. The babyboomers have been at the wheel for the last 30 years, and they have left us a mess to clean up from their greed.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10171591/10-Bab...
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/10/who-dest...
https://www.ced.org/blog/entry/are-we-about-to-let-all-of-th...
--I am an internal IT and Development Manager. I work with internal clients everyday who do not know what they are asking for is a simple content change, or a major architectural rethink. My internal clients need some help with the /business analysis/ of what they are asking for is a sensible thing. They do not know if a series of pages only accessible to their external client is something simple for us to achieve, or something that will take a decade. They really don't. Their job is to drive things forward for their clients, and my job is to look at what all their requests look like across our company and push forward the things that will help everyone.
Your job as a consultancy is to help us clients determine what is low hanging fruit and what is not. You might have something easy to ship as a client data access system, and it would take you 10 days or 10 weeks. Or it might take you 10 months. Or it might take you 10 years. The company I work for for could probably do A, B, or C, but definitely not D. If it is D, then how can we simplify the requirement? That is your job as a consultant.
1 in 20 (~50 in 1000) in the UK until 1940/1950. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633559/
and lots of interesting reading here: https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1...
Giving local admin to the non-technical staff who want to download 'free' software (not FLOSS, free as in beer) because they think (at best) that they are saving the company money, but instead infest their computer malware. Most people are totally disinterested in their computing environment, let alone managing it. We standardise on certain packages because there is utility in having common programs from support, training, and administration points of view, but ultimately if there is a good reason to get/use something else, we will do that.
Furthermore, any user with a local admin access can use a Kerberos 'Golden Ticket' leverage attack to gain full domain access across the entire realm.
Are you seriously telling me that you want the teller at your bank to have local admin access to his workstation?
How about the person at the IRS/CRA/HMRC/<you government tax office> that you just called?
Local admin has its place, and certainly the first test is that will the person endanger their system by running dubious programs. The next question is if that person does infect their system, can they clean up the mess themselves?
We went from a situation where we had local admin across our estate where we had at least one virus problem a week to one where I can not remember the last time we had one. Finally, can you really trust a Windows workstation after it has had an infection?