683 karma · joined October 31, 2013
Then SCO got greedy and tried to charge for royalties from IBM and Novell. They both said no, we'll see you in court.
I'm not sure if groklaw is still around, but that was a really good resource.
This is also part of Ansible's philosophy: to be agentless and as thin as possible.
Puppet and chef are significantly more complex, and historically required remote agents on the hosts they managed.
On the threads about Progress buying chef and VMware buying Saltstack, it was pretty clear that the sentiment of the community was that things have moved passed chef and puppet to Ansible and Terraform.
The US started a huge build up of arms. eg missiles and destroyers specifically, but also the US had significant advances with tank and aircraft weaponry.
The US consumerist system had a positive feedback into the US industrial military complex where advances in manufacturing and information technology lead to huge efficiency gains for arms production even though Western arms production supply chains almost completely isolated.
So, the US had a massive technology and manufacturing advantage, then the US tanked world oil prices and other commodities that the USSR required from world markets. Significantly the USSR was buying more grain and food from the world market, so while the USSR was able to keep up with technology, it was not able to keep up with efficiency gains that the US was realising.
Corruption was also a huge problem for the USSR, and it still is to this day in Russia.
The Americans bankrupted the USSR on multiple fronts. Capital allocation is a capitalist system notion, but, more generally, the US was able to allocate deploy its available resources in a way that out-competed the USSR. The USA was able to organise its society and economy in a more efficient and productive way than the USSR, and that is a Macro Economic argument.
Until the 80's the USA had second most equitable distribution of wealth next to the USSR. The USA imposed significant taxes on everybody up to a marginal rate of 80%. If you want to "Make America Great Again", you need to restore taxation to the levels seen between 1945 and 1981; maybe even to the end of the 80's. American government funding through the DARPA project lead to numerous technological advances that most people, worldwide, now depend upon.
For whatever reason, American love to malign things as socialist, and confuse communist totalitarian with socialism.
With Postgres, you can just drop the binary table data files in, restart the database and pg rebuilds the indexes and relationships.
From a quick google, it now looks like MySQL is now more robust in this regard.
The USA spends 20% of GDP on healthcare. All other advanced economies spend about 10%.
Consultants make at £400 day here, dotnet devs usually more.
If you are a hobbiest, it's cheaper.
And the costs decrease each year.
If you are saying £100, then it sounds like it would offer you money for value, so it's probably not for you.
I was lucky and could simply redeploy my application, but I have never used Mysql since.
Further the tracks in NA are designed to carry weight rather than for speed. The design considerations are quite different.
Cheaper for personal use, and free for students.
https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/buy/#commercial?billing=yearl...
I agree that it is less bad than Fox and other Murdoch media.
The answers for access and Oracle are both brilliant and true.
I turn it off as soon as I can upon installation of any distribution.
In fact, I loathed the lab components. I always felt they were highly contrived, and offered little value beyond having to learn the structure of writing out a formal lab.
I get that experimentation and laboratory work is a vital part of science. I just appreciated the problem solving components more.
Or can a properly designed attack break out of the VM and hardened kernel?
I have had quite a bit of success in having the technical teams assess the length of time a fix or a feature takes to do, but letting the stakeholders determine the relative priority.
I have seen requests and suggestions go from completely critical when requested, but when estimated at a couple of work then broken down into multiple much easier and clearer tasks when the stakeholders are included in the prioritisation discussion.
My experience is that stakeholders much prefer having things turned around quickly and they will what they can to optimise for things that are quickly and easily deliverable.
https://www.wearethemighty.com/history/ussr-won-jet-engine-b...
Yes some of them have gift card programs already, but they probably don't want expanded regulations to contend with large sums of money.