That is an immature non-intellectual response. I am done with this thread. Have a good one.
19 karma · joined August 9, 2021
That is an immature non-intellectual response. I am done with this thread. Have a good one.
And how's your infrastructure looking these days? Last time I was at LAX 10 years ago it looked worse than a third world country airport
Go to YouTube and search for "josh fluke corporate cringe". His channel is becoming more popular as he exposes this crap.
> In order to even get the IDE working with a project you need to configure it to work.
Meaning you already have a Maven/SBT/Gradle project and need to get the IDE to work with it.
We know about them. When you start adding these scripts to vi and Emacs they're no longer in the realm of plain text editors. You can add a bunch of hacks to turn vi or Emacs into a poor mans IDE.
But I know what you mean. I've worked on Scala code for years and seen less mature developers over-engineer things and get way too clever with the type system. Scala is a really practical and powerful industrial language that requires some maturity to use the abstractions sparingly. It's only good for the top 5% of developers.
However, Go doesn't have such a powerful type system. It looks like the Go designers implemented relatively simple generics. You have to draw the line somewhere. If simple Go generics are too confusing and complicated then that developer should probably find another job, as generics are a basic concept in programming. The Go designers are pragmatic people, and they've decided that relatively simple generics will make things easier in mainstream commercial codebases.
It runs well if you have the time, patience and expertise. There's no fundamental technical barriers. It's purely a matter of enough development resources being committed to the project. I think Apples recent moves would motivate more developers to work on it.