1,626 karma · joined March 1, 2009
I'm not sure if you're joking or just don't have any kids yourself, but those are more age-appropriate for a 3-month-old than a 3-year-old. 3-year-olds generally can make art independently, turn paper pages carefully, pretend and role play, draw by holding pens with their fingers, speak 300-500 words in sentences of six or more words, tell stories, climb, ride tricycles (maybe a scooter!), use safety scissors, and so on.
3-year-olds are far beyond the goo goo gaa gaa phase of life. Simple STEM toys (like what OP is looking for) are totally appropriate for most 3-year-olds. Sure, you're not going to explain tensor physics to them but you can certainly build a bridge with Duplo blocks with them and experiment with different ways of making it strong.
You can read more about basic development milestones here: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/milestones/milestones-3y...
The most egregious thing, in my mind, is that YouTube wraps toddler videos in ads for things like the John Wick movie and local breweries in my area. The fact that this isn't a difficult problem to solve is the strongest indication that A) YouTube knows exactly what's going on, and B) they frankly do not care because they can make a buck off of showing shockingly inappropriate content to children.
https://www.engadget.com/2007/06/30/iphone-doesnt-work-with-...
This is unfortunate, but that's the nature of publishing in this newfangled media landscape. (As they say.)
Source?
Try going back to page 1 — each page will appear to load instantly if you have all the images cached.
I think they jinxed themselves: "Running apps will not be affected."