You're answering your own question:
> potential job creation. Which could be significant
1,125 karma · joined March 3, 2018
You're answering your own question:
> potential job creation. Which could be significant
As some comments point out, Nintendo is the only console/video games company that's been trying to do fun things instead of trying to come up with the most powerful console in the universe.
This is the gaming i like, i don't care for 3000 fps and 1000Ghz consoles, i just want to have fun :-)
So, yeah, thanks Nintendo, i'll be buying this Switch 2.
And my average brain always thought and still thinks that instead of chasing these unicorn entities that still can't be found, maybe we should reconsider some things, as it seems to be the case presented here in this article.
This is your own (wrong) conclusion.
The problem isn't about obsolete infrastructure as the infrastructure isn't bad (fiber).
The problem is about small companies in a small market (<500000 inhabitants) competing on price with an international juggernaut.
It's obviously difficult for Local ISP(s) to have a good ROI when you're deploying fiber for <50000 customers.
If Starlink comes in and provides slightly better service at half the price, it's gonna be pretty bad for the local companies.
But one thing to keep in mind, is that usually ISPs in small countries can't compete on price because they don't have enough scale and enough customers, in the end they just can't compete with a juggernaut like Starlink.
Although as a customer i'd love to just use Starlink and pay less for better quality of service, these local ISPs are important actors of the local economy. If these companies shutdown because of international competition, it's money going to the US, and the local economy taking a hit ...
Seriously though, i think working at a startup at an early stage in your career is a great opportunity to work on a lot of things with lots of dedicated people.
On a side note, robotics is an exciting field as i do think robots gonna be everywhere in the not so distant future, from advanced drones, to agricultural robots, to humanoid robots, etc...
Sad thing is, this move isn't motivated by Mark Zuckerberg having a eureka moment and now trying to seek out the truth to build a better product for human kind.
This move is motivated by Mark's realizing he is on the wrong side of American politics now, being left behind by the Trump/Musk duo.
Episode III: The Return of the Kwon
There's many forces at play here, and many different ways to play the game.
Markets are not that efficient, not everything is priced in. Earnings would have 0 effect on price if that was the case for example.
Whether you play the market on higher timeframes or on lower timeframes, different factors come in to play.
I think it's obvious that chart patterns are a thing, (shameless plug here: i'm building https://edgefound.xyz, an app to create and backtest complex trading setups). It's actually interesting how many patterns (or setups) repeat across markets and timeframes. Mostly because prices are set by traders and traders react in the same way to the same events / price movements.
This is a fascinating relationship, is there a definitive answer / theory on this ? Why are Mathematics so effective to describe the world ? Are Mathematics a feature of the Universe or merely a Human tool ?
I haven't been reading on the subject for quite some time, what are good books on this relationship between Mathematics and Nature?
1/ Yann Lecun probably is the one pushing for open source
2/ Mark isn't doing this for the greater good and for humanity. It helps his business because Llama is becoming a standard, and people are building / improving, which in turn helps Meta and Meta's business
Although queuing systems can be implemented on top of a database, message queues like RabbitMQ / ZeroMQ are doing a fine job. I use RabbitMQ all the time, precisely because i need to transfer data between systems and i have multiple workers working asynchronously on that data.
I guess these architectures might be less popular, or less talked about, because monoliths and simple webapps are more talked about than complex systems ?
Given the size of the universe, billions of galaxies, and each galaxy having billions and billions of stars, life obviously exists somewhere else, and we can safely say it exists in many places and intelligent life forms have emerged and have built civilizations somewhere else.
Given the age of the universe, it's highly probable that other intelligent life forms have built civilizations way more advanced than the human civilization.
Most of human scientific and technological progress happened in the last 200 hundred years. We can only imagine what a society with a 100 000 years head start would look like. I can't imagine what the human race will look like and will be able to do in 10 000 years.
Our galaxy has a 100 000 light years diameter, even if an advanced civilization somewhere in the galaxy, on a planet 20 000 light years away had invented radio 10 000 years ago, we still wouldn't be able to detect it. By the time we detect it, who knows what technological progress they'd made by then.
I tend to think that the answer to the Fermi paradox is that the universe is so big. Even if we could travel at the speed of light, the universe would still be huge and we would probably not be able to detect other intelligent life forms / civilizations.
EDIT: Oops, looks like i got this Proxima Centauri distance a bit off :-) Updated the comment to remove this error, as the main point still stands.
Can't get it to do some actual work and write some code.
Latest disappointment was when i tried to convert some python code to java code.
90% of the result was :
// Further processing...
// Additional methods like load, compute, etc.
// Define parameters needed
// Other fields and methods...
// Other fields follow the same pattern
// Continue with other fields
// Other fields...
// Methods like isHigh(), addEvent() need to be implemented based on logic
ChatGPT has become an unusable lazy 20$ a month hole in my pocket. Can't get it to do some actual work and write some code.
Latest disappointment was when i tried to convert some python code to java code.
90% of the result was :
// Further processing...
// Additional methods like load, compute, etc.
// Define parameters needed
// Other fields and methods...
// Other fields follow the same pattern
// Continue with other fields
// Other fields...
// Methods like isHigh(), addEvent() need to be implemented based on logic
The results really are impressive. Being able to generate such high quality videos, to extend videos in the past and in the future shows how much the model "understands" the real world, objects interaction, 3D composition, etc...
Although image generation already requires the model to know a lot about the world, i think there's really a huge gap with video generation where the model needs to "know" 3D, objects movements and interactions.
I guess it was anticipated.
And i thought it would be easy, what a rookie mistake.
Looks like "France" isn't on the list of available regions for Ai Studio ?
Now i'm trying to use Vertex AI, not even sure what's the difference with Ai Studio, but it seems it's available.
So far i've been struggling for 15 minutes through a maze of google cloud pages: console, docs, signups. No end in sight, looks like i won't be able to try it out
- display news top to bottom to quickly see what's to do next
- keep the live civilizations on the left and push the collapsed ones to the right / bottom
Didn't know that, interesting to know.
> So successful AGI alignment (...) might be as simple as adding a secondary "impulse control" layer to the stack that reevaluates proposed actions and predicts the consequences of such actions, weighing projected net benefits and costs.
Problem is how the super AGI gonna weight benefits and costs.
What's the cost of stealing or killing to a super AGI ?
At some point can't that super AGI consider that all those rules we're trying to enforce, are rules set by an inferior entity and so could be bypassed ?
Well, maybe we should acknowledge that we've never even been able to do that with humans. There's crime, there's war, etc...
We can see crime in our societies as a human alignment problem. If humans were "properly aligned", there wouldn't be any crime or misbehavior.
So yeah i'm rather skeptical about aligning a superhuman intelligence that would dwarf us by its capabilities.
- easy setup but nothing more than http monitoring
- complex platforms that can monitor everything but are expensive and a pain to setup
Obviously that's something every software developper could add to his own project, that's not rocket science, but after the nth project, it becomes a bit tiresome :-)
Fwiw, here's some example exercises for Achilles: https://routineshub.com/public/1faae50e-8d36-4eec-84ee-ae3ef...