so the point of this is to give more power to the algorithm (since it includes unintentional autoplays) and less power to the people who upload the videos?
I feel like someone could describe foam emerging from the sea without implying that it is a process in time. It could be thought of as a process relating to the properties of seawater, wave agitation, sand etc. It is possible for a picture, not a video, to depict foam emerging from the sea. Also, there need not be a before or after, or even quantifiable extrinsic changes.
Perhaps an indication of its superficiality is the awkwardness of describing something as "content about" a topic. Its more like a binary, on/off, in that way similar to a lightbulb.
Im not really sure what you're suggesting so I can't really evaluate whether it is plausible. What I meant by semantical byproduct was that a definition based on a waveform needs to be supplemented with an argument that the definition is independent of the choice of waveform, because multiple different waveforms can describe the same particles depending on which components of the system are considered as classical.
So does this imply that the phrase "entangled system" doesn't mean anything about a specific system but rather indicates which types of statistics govern a class of systems produced en mass?
It could be used for FTL comms if you can figure out how to choose the outcome of a measurement before performing a measurement, which isn't something that I know how to do.