8,120 karma · joined September 10, 2015
I was confused too. Whoever wrote the title(s) doesn’t know a second language, otherwise, they would have realized how confusing that was, even to native English speakers.
I attribute them to the fact that, while trying to sleep with a fever, my eyes are half-open, and any sharp object becomes a visible geometric shape that my brain attempts to comprehend but almost fails to. I still experience them in adulthood. I’ve never had sleep paralysis, but whenever I think of people who have it, I imagine it feels as debilitating as these half-sleep experiences where you’re unable to move while your brain processes distressing memories.
“Geometric Nightmares” is not a scientific name. It is simply the name given to this phenomenon in forums [1][2] where people discuss and share their experiences.
Kubernetes project will be the first one [3] I guarantee it.
[1] https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/google/uuid
[3] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/2220c3853a2402...
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jadeite_Cabbage
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meat-Shaped_Stone
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mao_Gong_ding
• https://theme.npm.edu.tw/exh106/npm_anime/cabbage/en/index.h...
• https://theme.npm.edu.tw/exh106/NorthandSouth-4/en/index.htm...
• https://theme.npm.edu.tw/exh104/npmforfun/en/mediaworks/medi...
• https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49080605 (JetBrains, Does Speaking to Agents Like Cavemen Save 65% of Tokens? We Test)
• https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48588755 (The Token Compression Illusion: Why I'm Skeptical of RTK )
Clarification: It wasn’t closed on submission though. It sat open ~17 days, a bot marked it stale, and it closed when nobody responded to the stale label.
The two-phase thing is the part I didn’t know until recently: the stale label is basically asking “is this still relevant?”, and answering it makes the bot back off next time around. nixpkgs does the same. Bumping feels wrong on most trackers, agreed, but at this issue volume I don’t know what else works.
Anyway a comment should reopen it. Your CLI vs desktop screenshots are a better repro than most things in that tracker.
I prefer this one: https://mothersruin.com/software/SuspiciousPackage/
But I’ve used both at different times with equally great results.
[1] https://hr.ucmerced.edu/hr-units/talent-acquisition/senate-b...
[2] https://www.adp.com/spark/articles/2023/03/pay-transparency-...
Because Anthropic does not want to give Project Glasswing’s partner airgapped access to the model(s).
Same problem with OpenAI Cyber program. They grant access but only through their (Internet facing) API.
It’s just a very long recipe for Phở (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pho)
Is the hack that it’s supposedly doable in under 30 minutes?
Brazil has the largest ethnic Japanese population outside of Japan, with an estimated 2 million people of Japanese descent. Most of these individuals live in the state and city of São Paulo, which features the famous Japanese neighborhood of Liberdade [2][3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_community_of_Düsseldo...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberdade_%28district_of_São_P...
But is it faster than the upcoming https://pkg.go.dev/encoding/json/v2 (Go v1.26) ?
What do you mean? A lot of us already use Hanzi (汉字) or Kanji.
Or are you asking why non-Chinese speakers do not prompt LLMs in Mandarin?
Speaking of this, GitHub replaced theirs with a pancake emoji.
Maybe related to the stacked pull-requests announcement earlier today.
Spoiler: it’s OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 and Anthropic’s Mythos Preview [**].
[**] Reminder that Mythos Preview is a very different beast from Fable5, Mythos5, and Opus5. Unfortunately, anyone outside Project Glasswing will probably never get to test what this model can actually do, which is a shame, and it’s a big part of why the industry is so skeptical of the capabilities insiders keep claiming it has. I’d be skeptical too if I hadn’t tested it myself.
We lost access to Mythos Preview when Anthropic forced us onto Mythos 5 some weeks ago, which is garbage by comparison. I’ve already switched to GPT-5.5 and I’m working on adapting my harness(es) to less restrictive open-weight models. I don’t see any other way forward at this point.
The benchmarks are here → https://echo.tracerml.ai/eval/
They are not good benchmarks but at least they exist.
[1] https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/how-tos/commit-chan...