2. If it's the correct solution on a high level
3. Whether it conflicts with or duplicates other parts of the system
4. Whether the comments are actually useful or restating the LLM chat
Also many others but these are the most common IME
499 karma · joined September 8, 2014
2. If it's the correct solution on a high level
3. Whether it conflicts with or duplicates other parts of the system
4. Whether the comments are actually useful or restating the LLM chat
Also many others but these are the most common IME
Classics:
Busdriver - Me-Time (With The Pulmonary Palimpsest): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a0Y-CRx4nE
Kendrick Lamar - reincarnated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek7UvQPCQnE
Black Star - Re:Definition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt2lLWxxV9w
Leftfield:
Themselves - Each Ant in Their House: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjkZDGZ5SB8
Sole & Dose - Human Races the Tortoise: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RP52H9bdag
Last 12 months:
Little Simz - Lotus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2BplWSCZpY&list=RDZ2BplWSCZ...
Jim Legxacy - idk idk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZzvQP2fV-c&list=RDsZzvQP2fV...
AI music on the other hand comes not from the underground, but from corporations. You'll be hard pushed to find any critics or music connoisseurs singing its praises.
If an AI improves developer productivity so much, why would maintainers of an OSS project want unknown contributors to sit in between the maintainer and the LLM? They'd be typing these queries into Claude Code themselves. To quote my colleague:
> We do not need a middleman to talk to AI models. We are not bottlenecked by coding.
I, like everyone started work on OSS because it's fun. The problem comes when your project gets popular - either you try to make it your job or you abandon the project, because at a certain point it becomes like an unpaid job with really demanding customers.
> It's insane to blame everybody else for not being able to create a viable business model from an OSS project. Everybody who is using Tailwind is actually SUPPORTING Tailwind. Everybody who is reporting bugs properly is SUPPORTING Tailwind. Everybody who is collaborating and PRs changes is SUPPORTING Tailwind.
> Tailwind grew a lot due to community acceptance and support, and collaborations.
> The only person to blame here is the CEO/Main maintainer of Tailwind. They've made bad decisions, hired coders without knowing how to make enough money to pay them.
> If you want to monetize a free service, you either know what you do or you make mistakes and lose what you've built. It was always a risk; we are not at fault.
> @adamwathan I respect you for everything you've done, but you need to take a few breaths, take a walk, think, sleep, and come back, ask apologize of the community, and start working on solutions/crisis management.
And you always know that when you open the GH profile of people saying such things, you'll see an empty timeline. This particular user has a single repository which he's committed to a handful of times over the last year and has setup a GitHub sponsorship for it.
I try to remind myself that these types of people are a (loud) minority but it's absolutely soul destroying.
(Teams still can't copy images, instead you get a massive base64 block of text iirc)
Gun control, you mean?
But that's different. This was near Lunetta Gamberini in broad daylight :) To be fair it's not something I've seen since.
Walking around the neighborhood I noticed that there were no wifi networks at all.
The roads hadn't been resurfaced since the 1970s according to the locals and I totally believe them.
There's a reason Italians call it Calafrica. It definitely doesn't feel like western Europe.