Every one of them could be used to kill someone, just like a crowbar.
278 karma · joined October 17, 2008
Every one of them could be used to kill someone, just like a crowbar.
In this age of smart-everything, there's no help for that?
Seems strange.
Further, to make things even less difficulty, I'd think it'd be rather straight-forward to map out the select stores they go to in the extremely small set of markets they serve. Certainly considering this is their profession, no?
They could make an app for that.
It may be expensive, either in complexity, costs of storage/services, etc, but it's a necessity.
I'm curious about many of the comments in this thread - why are people logging in as table owners? It's not too difficult (for talented data-driven companies) to create roles or accounts that, while powerful, still make it difficult to drop a table and such.
However, I was specifically replying to the context of having distractions (kids, in this case) in gcp's and alistairSH's comments.
When at home, if I feel the a distraction looming, it's easy to shut the door. Problem (mostly) solved.
Sorry about that."
Bummer.
http://www.harristeeter.com/shopping/express_lane/policies.a...
You order online and then pull up to a curbside box and they bring out your order. I'm sure other area's have similar options.
I've never owned a smartphone and usually use basic candybar or flip phones, such as this cheap $20 Nokia sitting next to me. I can't say that reason sounds likely. (And I have a whole drawer full of old, cheap phones that I give to foreigners visiting the US)
Dropped calls are rather rare for me and usually happen when I'm sitting still in my office, not moving about.
It might actually take a little effort and time. We don't know what's involved.
Not quite what I'm used to.
Either way, a bummer of a story. I've had my own issues with eBay and rarely check there except for infrequently needed (cheap) odds and ends. I hope it works out.
But that doesn't invalidate my reply, which was about the numbers being compared and the context of those numbers.
Are there many people living in the desert where the military trains? Or over open water? Many military bases don't have residential areas in the immediate vicinity, unlike most civilian airports. (Sure, there are exceptions to both, but as a whole - what's the norm?)
I realize there are incidents that have involved civilians, such as when I was in San Diego and an F-18 (?) crashed into a neighborhood near Miramar in San Diego. My questions: what is the total number of civilian casualties from military "incidents" and how does that compare to civilian incidents? And what other airspace can they fly in? Is there no way to compromise? Etc.
I'm not arguing for or against contractors or drones. I would think they should be launched from military bases, if at all. My goal is to look at it from the right perspective.
But in context, this is a very small amount of the total set of government contractors, most of which are designers, analysts, aircraft/ship building and maintenance, software developers, among a host of other areas. Only a few have a big hand to play in questionable/Black Ops/mercenary roles.
"It's like comparing over-powered motorbikes in the hands of reckless teenagers with school buses."
I'm not excusing the error rate, but civilian aircraft have a faily simple set of operations: fill aircraft with people and/or cargo, fly a pre-determined route at a relatively stable airspeed, and land. Also, what was the error rate of civilian aircraft during development (as the F-16 number reflects)?
Outside of the Concorde, I don't think they have to worry about supersonic speeds. Also, nor are they concerned high angles of attack, or reduced aerodynamics at low altitudes, or low/near surface flying, and a plethora of other uses and scenarios.
Unless I misinterpreted your statement, then disregard this reply.
Almost all the contractors I know were in the Air Force, Marines, Navy or Army for some period time. (It's usually very helpful as they still have the necessary clearances and don't need to be sponsored to get one.)
--- "Hate" is a weird concept to bring up. RIM went from practically defining this market to having a substandard product. That's why most of their users are unhappy, not because their brand is simply unfashionable or some other kind of perceptual issue.
If BB10 is good, then great, maybe RIM can right the ship and become a real competitor again. We both hope this will be the case. ---