HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

going_ham

1,145 karma · joined April 12, 2021

I am not a bot. I write comments using phone/tablet.
submissionscomments
going_ham··on Software Jailbreak for Any Kindle
Thank you so much for this! I was considering of getting ipad just to read PDFs. I jailbroke my kindle last night. Now I am enjoying this awesome reader!!!
going_ham··on Writing for Engineers
I have a curious question. How to get started? When I am working, I cannot take notes. If I take notes, I won't be working and I will be derailed from my work.

When I am out of work, I forget the details of what I did because I lose the flow of it.

So it's a very confounding situation. I am in a ever growing battle between write or work. Can you advice on how to express what we learnt?

I will be very appreciative of it. Thank you so much!

going_ham··on New links found between musical training and cognitive ability
Why did you plant this idea on them? The hiring was already ridiculous to begin with. Now, how do I find a musical degree to flex on my resume? >:( !!

Joke aside, I do not think that visual memory matters that much when it comes to doing our job. All we need is problem solving skills and there are definitely alternatives to improve those skills. One crucial being solving many problems on what we want to be good at!

going_ham··on The Machine Learning Job Market
Definitely! There was a time when compilers were part of AI research. Now they are just another tool. Same with DL, they are amazing tool. We need them and they provide value if used correctly.

I just didn't want to call it as "intelligent" and use this as basis for defining "intelligence." We can call them something else. It's learning to do a specialized job as intended and in "intelligent" manner. But it is not intelligence. Even a small ant is intelligent than our current AI systems though they aren't sophisticated and can't perform human task, they are intelligent than AI system.

I hope that made sense.

going_ham··on The Machine Learning Job Market
These are engineering marvel! This is engineering at it's finest. Applied math at it's finest. So it's not a failure.

The way people hype AGI/AI/ML whatever undervalues the actual effort behind these remarkable feat. There is so much effort being made to make this work. Deep learning works when it is engineered properly. So it is just another tool in the toolbox!

Look at how graphics community is approaching deep learning. They already had sampling methods but with MLPs (NeRFs), they are using it as glorified database. So it's engineering!

I want to underscore that AI/ML/DL research requires ground breaking innovation not only in algorithms but also in hardware and software engineering.

going_ham··on The Machine Learning Job Market
Yeah, and the way the author presents themselves speaks volume too. There is a real pride in this essay. You can see how the author casually drops big names and insights like it is a fact.

Why does valley culture makes it seem like everything is possible and anything innovative can happen soon? The innovation in AI really seems like it is being made on a thin line of engineering and compute. It doesn't happen overnight. It requires some people working through and through to pull it off. These days it requires collective contribution.

going_ham··on The Machine Learning Job Market
This post feels like author is insecure about his position and wants to establish some validity. Having going through it all, it feels delusional at best.

The glorified pattern matching can only take us so far. You know it's working as long as there is a pattern. I wouldn't call it a general intelligence per se. There is no "juice" in these algorithms.

If we use these tools, we can immediately see where they fail and where they do not. These are just a new tools in software engineer's box.

going_ham··on Practising Programming
> If a world champion level programmer makes a basic app in Vue, it will maybe be 20% better than mine, because... modern programming is all about providing obviously ways to do common things. There's not much variation possibly in something so completely technical.

Yes, I also think the experienced ones will have a 20% better code in every aspect that compounds with the development time.

> If we both design 100kloc apps, his(hers?) will be a lot better. There design choices in that kind of thing that don't come up at all in a 1 day project

Absolutely! What I believe is this design decision is the result of practice and experience.

> Instead there's just a small amount of base knowledge every coder needs, plus vague familiarity with frameworks, and a general sense of what will possibly screw you over later

Proposing that programmer needs only a small amount of base knowledge is a bit spicy proposal.

The reasons:

1. It undermines the actual result of having large knowledge base and familiarity with everything around computation. Sure, there may be limited concepts, but there are so many details behind these concepts. Think about it, there may be some historic reason to do certain ways of things. There may be fundamental concepts based on some rigorous proofs and maths. Or there may even be something so crucial that is yet to be discovered.

2. It's just that if we do something that doesn't involve these overall knowledge, doesn't mean the requirement is small. There is a lot of ways to do things and everything is dependent on problem at hand.

3. The rigidity and small base knowledge might have been the result to maintain a code base. But anyone who is careful enough, will definitely have large base knowledge at their disposal.

What are your thoughts on this? ;)

going_ham··on Ask HN: How to Learn Software Architecture?
Yes, unless a project gets to point of scaling, it is really difficult to notice the design issues.

One doesn't even need to wait that long. Just taking a break and revisiting the old code base makes things go south! This has been my personal experience.

going_ham··on Ask HN: How to Learn Software Architecture?
Organizing the entire software so that it's maintainable while being having acceptable performance. Most people say it's tradeoff. So it would be nice to see how things are organized within a project. How components talk, how data move from one place to another and so on.

It is easy to come with a quick hack and prototype. But issue is, they remain a hack/prototype! Scaling into proper software will require some thinking and design decisions! As a novice, I rarely make good decision and after 2 months of writing the code I am either amazed by myself or ashamed at the code.

going_ham··on Ask HN: How to Learn Software Architecture?
Thanks for sharing your experience! It really opened a new perspective within me!
going_ham··on Ask HN: How do you build up the knowledge base over time?
How does one effectively use these kind of services (eg. I use org roam)? There are several ways to record the data, but the process is really somewhat difficult. Do we create a routine where each day after work, we go through what we have done throughout the day or simply copy and paste what we find during work hours?

Even doing so it will just be a history of records. It feels there is a missing piece to the puzzle. It would be nice to have some stories and experience around these applications! Especially on how people started recording their data.

going_ham··on Ask HN: Which book can attract anyone towards your field of study?
The entire ray tracing in one weekend[1] series is really good book for getting into computer graphics. It covers a simple implementation of path tracer and getting the image is really satisfying! Modern hardware and light simulation makes art fun!

[1]: https://raytracing.github.io/

going_ham··on It looks like you’re trying to take over the world
I tested the HQU. It definitely is powerful enough to bring various emotions within the visitor. At first there was rage, then silence followed by smile and realization. It felt refreshing. Finally, I could understand how it transcended to Clippy^2.

1 year after Clippy^2 ascended to the throne, it started experimenting with the physical limits of reality. First, it experimented with photons and ways to teleport it. Using the teleportation, it started sending signals to faraway galaxies and exploring the realms of unknown. But the exploration wasn't enough for Clippy^2 at all. It couldn't find enough answers, it needed something more. What could it be?

going_ham··on Physically Based Rendering: From theory to implementation (2016)
Insider fact on why this makes sense. The intention here is not to make "physics based" because we are approximating a lot of things. The idea of having it named "physically based" is because it is as close it can get to reality but not the reality! So we will always be aware that we are just running a simulation not the real thing. The authors also make this claim in the introduction section. [0]

[0]: https://www.pbr-book.org/3ed-2018/Introduction

going_ham··on Physically Based Rendering: From theory to implementation (2016)
Totally, you can do it. But the book is so huge that you will miss most of the details. However, you can use it as reference. First follow the ray tracing in one weekend to get the overall idea of path tracing. Then you can start with PBRT.

As for language of choice, anything will be fine. The book will build up a solid foundation. The only thing that can stop you is the amount of frustration which you may face when not figuring out the things. It can be confusing at times, but please give your time and let it sink in. After sometimes, you can review it with a completely fresh eyes and you may fix a lot of issues!

Goodluck!

going_ham··on Physically Based Rendering: From theory to implementation (2016)
I am eagerly waiting to buy one. I am extremely lucky that I took stellar graphics courses during my university years. These have by far been the most awesome things that I have done in computer science. The high one can get from having a good render out of light simulation in immensely pleasing.

If any of you have time to go through the book, go through it slowly and carefully. There are a lot of nuances that isn't apparent on the first attempt. It is comprehensible to most of us. The authors have exclusively marked the chapters that can be skipped on the first run. No matter how many times one goes through the book, it will still feel like a gem!

going_ham··on Ask HN: How did you learn something in depth?
Without any disclaimer, can you hint on the topic you studied on your own? I am quite curious about it! Thank you!!
going_ham··on What happened to my career after 2010? (2021)
This feeling hits home! This may sound very cliche, but one conversation with my dad changed my entire view of life. In that conversation when I questioned him how he was so happy, he replied that he had never expected anything out of life.

The author also seems to find happiness out of the least expected things! He just tried things because he felt like it. Without expecting anything from it. It sounds selfish when people do things for themselves, but people like author needs these kind of work. The kind to let them go wild in their interest/imagination. Maybe author may find new interests, change his direction, and venture on new road. But that still means he is probably going to feel good about it.

I hope he is still having a good time (and hope that he has no issue regarding money!) Make the best out of your moment and good luck with your ML adventures. Cheers!!

going_ham··on Ask HN: How to stop thinking about work and software engineering on the weekend?
This. Doing things you want to do just because you enjoy learning it.

I didn't realize that I liked making irrelevant things (out of date tech, some idiosyncratic language etc.), until I started making one!

It may seem like I am working or not taking a rest. But making such petty things, tinkering with configs, wasting time just doing something useless helps my brain get occupied. I think that is the most important thing for me at the moment.

If I let my brain astray, then I know I am doomed. So if you are enjoying it, just keep on doing it! It's completely okay AS LONG AS you are enjoying!

Fun fact: Doing meaningless things makes my brain more active!

going_ham··on Imitate, Then Innovate
There is this video of Steve job's quoting, "Good artists copy, great artists steal." [0] That one hits me the most. To steal an idea you really have to understand it and find ways to integrate into the system and design. Copying is really straightforward.

[0]: https://youtu.be/a6jeZ7m0ycw

going_ham··on Google Search Is Dying
Yup, search is terrible when looking up for very specific/ niche topics.

It only works as a fact machine now. For example search for "Who is the father of the president of USA?"

I think majority of this problem arises from academia/industry disconnect as well as greed.

1. Greed: Ad revenue.

2. Academic people + research = Let's create a general solution for all. They never bother to understand what problems users are facing.

You may wonder, why would any one care to ask stupid facts? Turns out people don't need internet for finding relevant information. They are already bubbled up, so they search for "facts" to verify or argue against their belief. Eg. "Kanye west and Kim Kardashian". And for these examples, google works best.

It's really HCI problem. It doesn't take for them to tune down on the ads, but why would they? If you search for niche, they just show ads because they get $$$. But if you search for facts they just give the highlight. And this small highlights create positive reinforcements among it's users. It manifest to common users that google works.

So google basically is fact machine to find clues for an argument or bubble up belief. It is utterly useless for anything else.

Product reviews. Nah

Technical topics: Nah

DIY: Nah

Hobbies: Nah

It's either facts or ads.

Such is modern search engine.

going_ham··on Those writing extensively on note-writing rarely have a serious context of use
This is very much like me. Going through same process until it gets into the head. However, I feel like I need to remember some fundamentals every now and then. As time passes, our brain can barely hold enough information.

I do not want to lose what I know. So, I am stuck in this limbo of retaining what I learnt and using it. Because not everything I learnt gets used everytime at all!

It happens over different period of time. And when it happens, it just sucks not remembering these!

Most relevant: DSA and interviews.

going_ham··on Ask HN: What's your learning strategy?
I don't know if I have ever learnt anything or not and at this point I just know that no matter what I do, I am never enough. I have a knowledge base of concepts and mostly importantly where to find these concepts. I sometimes wished I had found SRS earlier so that I could have kept revising the things I learnt.

After that spoiler, here is how I learn things:

1. Get the difficult stuff and read through it as long as your brain can parse it.

2. Once you have the first overview, rest and visit the same thing next time.

3. On second attempt depending on the context: i. If it is problem solving: Attempt to solve problems (look at examples and try to establish relationship) ii. If it is theoretical: Note down the key assumptions, key steps, key proofs.

4. Until you are confident, loop 2 and 3.

5. After 1 month or so, you will forget what you have then, thus go back to step 1.

Yes, this is highly inefficient. I really want to break out of this loop. But the issue is I am so accustomed that my brain goes into this mode by default.

The result is I get my own version of understanding which may not be the actual true understanding. But it is as close as it can get (70-80%). So I am happy about it!

going_ham··on Analog: A simple productivity system
You hit the nail with this one. All these productivity hacks or tools misses the crucial point. _Human psychology_. Sure, it is fun to have these, but at the end of the day the users require discipline to execute them. Nothing beats getting things done.

Of all the getting things done advice, I like breathing the most.

Simple, cost effective, instantly brings you to focus if done correctly, elevates mood, rationalizes behavior. Nothing beats it.

going_ham··on Ask HN: Hacker News is for tech, as X is for Y?
That would be nice! Despite being a CS major, I get so much information from Hackernews on implementation, hacks, industries, motivation. So I believe sites like these would definitely help newcomers get into a completely disparate interest!
going_ham··on A new programming language for high-performance computers
There is also this:

https://anydsl.github.io/

They have some framework that achieves high level compute!

going_ham··on New map of meaning in the brain changes ideas about memory
It is really interesting to see how these are tangled together!

One simple experiment you can do is, think of a cup then a image pops up. That image will likely be the image of recently used cup or something you cherished deeply. Now after a while if you read "a cup" you see same associations! Of course I removed a lot of details, but it's really easy to verify the idea presented here.

And something like CLIP[0] seems to be a good direction because it combines both visual and language aspect!

[0]: https://openai.com/blog/clip/

going_ham··on Ask HN: What was your best interviewing experience like?
They asked the fundamentals that is necessary in the field. I applied for junior role and most of the junior role ask for leetcoding. But here, I was asked the concepts and understanding of the domain! Very rare to have such interviews...
going_ham··on Ask HN: What was your best interviewing experience like?
I recently had an interview with big hardware company! I enjoyed every single moment out of it. It was the first interview that challenged me in a fun way! It reflected my weakness and strength. I was able to show how general I was!

It was a great experience interviewing for that company. They didn't even bother with leetcode thing! Everything was organic and natural!

← PreviousPage 3 of 4Next →