exactly, just want to know if he is making an insightful geo-political theory on interactions between groups, or if it is hagbard celine and the yellow submarine.
naming the groups by their most conventional names, you gone so far as to create the dynamics of these groups, why forgo naming them? not really understanding the cloak and dagger element
"First, I will tell there are "groups", mind you, I only mean a collective of individuals and organisations, that many times are fighting amont themselves, also individually they may have different aims and purposes, but the "group" thing simplify the things."