I use cppcms most of times but in some cases I use Seastar for high perf.
8 karma · joined November 13, 2021
I use cppcms most of times but in some cases I use Seastar for high perf.
Spot on.
> C chose to be simple in the language itself and not in the code.
But it market itself being simple so people even newcomers think that C is simple in every regard. Only few people rarely acknowledge this fact.
> The single greatest praise that I will give to C is that the entirety of the language can be held in the mind of the programmer using it, with zero need for reference. This is impossible in most other languages.
In other languages, which parts you are unable to held in your mind?
The only instance where I need references in C++ is STD library features. But if we measure, it take less time than if we were to reinvent it on C.
C++ STD lib is not a big mess. At least, I am using it for decades. I don't know if you really used it because those who are against STD doesn't understand the point of abstractions and it's utility. They always tend to cite why would I use vector when I can create a "simple" linked list myself with pointers.
C++ on the otherhand is way simple to use and really straightforward.
I like Zig too.
To me, the ultimate solution for this problem is teaching philosophy before maths.
The ideal route is philosophy -> history of maths -> maths
I heard that Govs don't want to add this subject into school because it will create revolutionary thinkers and it sounds more like obfuscation to me.
It seems to be a proposal. The proposal was made by a user who was registered on 09/27/2021.
The text you quoted was included on his proposal. The project itself is not explicitly call that one out.
"Shoot First and Ask Questions Later"
> Merely knowing the syntax doesn't make one a "C++ programmer"
Does knowing all the possible abstract layers (uh, it's an ocean) make one a C ++ programmer then?
> this is even more true when you are messing around in the Kernel
It's his right to mess around Kernel and learn things.