5,415 karma · joined December 11, 2011
gioele@svario.it
Two decades ago I randomly found myself in a tiny lecture room with a Very Important Manager from a Very Big European Bank. She started her talk stating "In the '80s, the Italian politics had to choose between the economic model of the Olivetti's family and that of the Agnelli's family. They choose Agnelli's. That was a mistake." Followed by a long string of expletives.
For context and for contrast, the Agnelli family was the owner of FIAT, then the biggest private employers in Italy. They were strongly anti-unions. They even bought the most important newspaper in Turin (the headquartiers of FIAT) to suppress reports of workers initiatives and strikes.
I'd say that `quilt` the utility is pretty much abandoned at this point. The name `quilt` remains in the format name, but otherwise is not relevant.
Nowadays people that maintain patches do it via `gbp-pq` (the "patch queue" subcommand of the badly named `git-buildpackage` software). `gbp-pq switch` reads the patches stored in `debian/patches/`, creates an ephemeral branch on top of the HEAD, and replays them there. Any change done to this branch (new commits, removed comments, amended commits) are transformed by `gbp-pq export` into a valid set of patches that replaces `debian/patches/`.
This mechanism introduces two extra commands (one to "enter" and one to "exit" the patch-applied view) but it allows Debian to easily maintain a mergeable Git repo with floating patches on top of the upstream sources. That's impossible to do with plain Git and needs extra tools or special workflows even outside of Debian.
We have been (low-keep) working on something similar (more from an academic point of view) for the past few years:
This is the introductory article (open access): "Comparison of news commonality and churn in international news outlets with TARO" https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3603163.3609062
(Allow me a moment of pride for the student leading this project: the paper won the Ted Nelson Award at ACM Hypertext 2023.)
Between 1961 and 2023 «5,600 TWh of electricity were generated from nuclear energy in Germany». [1]
Every year Germany spends (and will have to spend until the end of time) at least 2 billion Euros just to keep the existing nuclear waste safe [2] (more than half of the yearly budget of the ministry of the environment and about 0.5% of the yearly government budget). That's a drag. Think about it: it's all unproductive money, that does not produce any new energy, and stopping these payments will cause irreparable damage to the environment. Forever.
[1] https://kernd.de/en/nuclear-energy-in-germany/ [2] https://www.bundesumweltministerium.de/ministerium/struktur/...
«basedir: support separate (vendor/local) trees and masking for config files» https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-specs/-/merge_request...
«basedir: support drop-ins for configuration paths» https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-specs/-/merge_request...
They provide plain good ol' GNU Mailman lists. You can bring your own domain or subdomain. They also have a good handle on privacy issues (GDPR requests and so on).
cough Ruby cough
Who would receive that money? Only the core developers? Anybody with "commit access"? In which share? Will it detract voluntary contributions? How should other companies working on the same code-base be treated? Are they allowed to contribute at all? Do they get some shares of the funds?
All these questions (and many others) that have been discussed in the Debian project for a long time and nobody has yet found an answer that is acceptable to everybody.
Some sources:
* "Debian + Dunc-Tank.org = dissent" (2006) https://lwn.net/Articles/201488/
* "Paying (some) Debian developers" (2019) https://lwn.net/Articles/790954/
* "DPL: Debian project has plenty of money but not enough developers" (2020) https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/10/debian_project_addres...
`j` and `ret` are so-called "pseudo instructions" [1], not compressed instructions.
Pseudo instructions are just shortcuts used in assembly language to pretend that some common operations really "exist" without the need to type (or display) the corresponding more complex (but actually existing) instructions. `nop` is a common pseudo instruction. RISC-V has no real `nop` instruction, but, instead, the "do nothing instruction" is canonically encoded as `addi x0, x0, 0`. The programmer can write a more understandable `nop`, and the assembler will write instead the binary code equivalent to `addi x0, x0, 0`.
The compressed instruction set (a.k.a "extension C"), instead, is a subset of the full [2] instruction set, in which a restricted combinations of operands are possible. The assembly (human readable) code of the compressed instruction set looks similar to that of the full instruction set (including pseudo instructions), but they are encoded as completely different binary sequences.
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-asm-manual/blob/master/riscv-...
[2] https://riscv.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/riscv-spec.pdf#...
Most induction systems can be controlled by ovens that have physical knobs. For example the AEG EU327MDE [1]. The hob-oven interface is more or less standardized. For unfathomable reasons such combined "induction hobs + compatible oven with physical controls" are not sold in all markets worldwide.
[1] https://www.euronics.de/haus-und-haushalt/kochen-und-backen/...
All hentaigana are available in Unicode 10. They can be found in the Unicode block 1B000–1B12F (Kana Supplement + Kana Extended-A).
For example, U+1B004 𛀄 HENTAIGANA LETTER A-3
There is wealth of research done on stand-off markup since the SGML times, with a renaissance in 2005-2010.
Historically, the main drawback (as highlighted by other comments) is that stand-off needs a way to refer to the content, i.e. a pointing mechanism. Pointers in a pointing mechanism can be either a) hard to write but easy to maintain or b) simple to write but prone to breaking after a change (and thus requiring support from authoring tools). Nobody has found a viable ergonomic balance yet.
Counterexample:
BigDecimal("1.5999999999999996") == 1.5999999999999996.to_d
=> false
The most ergonomic way to initialize decimal numbers is IMO "123.45".to_d
(Note the quotes around the number. `.to_d` is being called on a string.)BigDecimal's only lossless API is through strings. It would be nice to have native support for decimals at the parser level:
0d123.45 => BigDecimal("123.45") $ git whoami
GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT=Mel Smith <mel@example.org>
GIT_AUTHOR_IDENT=Mel Smith <mel@example.org>
`whoami` can be implemented via a simple alias: git config --global alias.whoami = "! git var -l | grep '^GIT_.*_IDENT'"What I have never understood is why IdenTrust accepted to cross-sign Let’s Encrypt's root certificate.
With that move, IdenTrust basically broke the CA cartel and helped driving the price of basic certificates to zero. How did they, as a for-profit organization, justify "doing the right thing" when that meant disrupting their own market?
Anyway, kudos to IdenTrust.
The most straightforward way to use CCAN is to
1) `git clone` it in a subdir;
2) create a `config.h`;
3) include whatever `lib.h` you want in your project.
Updating these micro dependencies means doing `git pull`.
All libraries come with tests and a somewhat standardized API design.
What is missing (compared to your aims) is a declarative way to lock a dependency to a specific version.
From reading the SIMD Everywhere description, it seems to me that SIMDe is a way to allow code that targets only a platform to work on other platforms as well. As a nice byproduct, you get _some_ speed up if architecture targeted by the code is similar to the architecture that will run the code.
Portability is the main focus, not speed.
Obviously, once you have a good emulation of an architecture the first question is going to be: can I make it faster?
Well, it has been done for Microsoft, it could be done for Apple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu
(I'm just stating a fact, not judging whether that is a good or a bad idea.)
It is impressive to see how much and how quickly the world has switched to "open-first" when it comes to schemas, documentation and software in general.
Examples:
* BizTalk (by Microsoft) https://web.archive.org/web/20000301195519/http://www.biztal...
* https://web.archive.org/web/20000511095737/http://www.openap...
Bonus: A review of XML schema repositories: https://www.xmltwig.org/article/bw/bw_04-schema_repositories...
> No, OpenSSL is exactly what we have in mind, including Filippo: https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/1270130358634283008
Please note that the next version of OpenSSL (version 3) will be licensed under the Apache 2.0 license [1], making it incompatible with GPL v2 libraries and applications [2].
GPL v2 applications will be stuck with OpenSSL 1.x (or GnuTLS or other libs).
[1] https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/OpenSSL_3.0#License_Chang... [2] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2
Sadly, it is representative of hospitals across all northern Italy: https://www.ilpost.it/2020/03/08/pesenti-emergenza-ospedali-... https://www.ilpost.it/2020/03/09/coronavirus-terapia-intensi... ("Affollamento e scelte difficili")
In my personal experience, the search functionality was extremely useful when using for the first time one a complex application such as Gimp or Libre Office. Unfortunately all extra functionalities (autocomplete, for instance) required the applications to explicitly support the HUD and few (any?) application added the necessary code once GNOME 3 appeared.
Here is the other thing with Italy: differently from other neighbor countries, they have been testing people without symptoms.
Numbers: until February the 24th, Italy performed ~8500 tests (mostly on people without symptoms, but that were in contact with confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients), while UK did ~6500 (focused on people with influenza-like symptoms), Germany ~1000 and France ~500.
This is better from a safety point of view (you get to discover all problematic patients earlier and you can quarantine them before they spread the infection even more). But is makes "your stats look worse" (cit. The wire) because now you look like the epicenter of the infection.
Guess what? The testing method has now been changed ("aligned") to what the other countries are doing, so that the numbers do not look that much worse.
Source: https://www.ilpost.it/2020/02/25/tamponi-coronavirus-italia-...
TLS+SNI sends the `Host` you are connecting to in plain text. eSNI is not yet widely deployed.
Centralizing DNS without centralizing HTTP (e.g. domain fronting) does not solve the leak of connection metadata.
Caches are no longer shared across domains because doing so leads to privacy leaks: https://www.jefftk.com/p/shared-cache-is-going-away