ghjkghjkghj

reading through this it is obvious what the "pain" is and it does come across as you just avoiding the question. Just sayin

Gonna say the edit they made removes the satire possibility.

There are some genuinely insane takes in this thread on both sides but this takes the cake.

I think he actually wrote an article rebutting binarybits and Anthropics claims around that time (though maybe not binarybits directly) here: https://www.wheresyoured.at/anthropics-profitability-swindle...

Either way it looks like he didn't just "repeat the numbers". He updated them and provided more data to back them up.

I don't understand how that affects what he has written here? How does his data not make sense?

Oof, you have Thomas admitting he didn't even remember this in the comments.