192 karma · joined January 5, 2023
That suggests a really sorry state of things, not something to copy. Online payments shouldn't be harder than physically going to a store and paying for the item.
Totally does.
Perhaps the goal is to render breach notifications useless by flooding them with nonsense like this?
You also can't set up a camera on the side of the road and store peoples registration plates and times when they drove past.
You could also easily track cellphone IMEIs and locations in the same way these services track aircraft, that's not gonna fly either.
Obviously you'll be completely fine if you only store data on commercial aviation, general aviation will pretty much immediately veer into GDPR territory.
Right now every single player in this space is operating illegally, but it'll probably take years before data protection authorities will start to crack down.
>Under GDPR, the fine would have been $420M
That's not how the GDPR works.
Hilton has over a million hotel rooms, 3.7M reservations is nothing.
Most likely this data comes from some OTA that was breached.
Edit: I downloaded the actual dump. It only contains 775k unique reservations from approx 450k unique people, the other 3M are just duplicates. All of the reservations are in the US, for only around 35 different properties.
The only PII contained in the dump are Hilton Honors IDs and names, there are no addresses despite the article claiming otherwise.
VRBO doesn't do this, and has way harsher payout policies for new hosts than AirBnB. VRBO can do this because VRBO is not trying to attract new hosts (new to hosting, not new to VRBO) in the first place.
AirBnB can't do the VRBO thing and escrow payments to new hosts for 30 days, that would be super discouraging for newcomers trying to list their flat for the first time.
Outlook, Yahoo, (insert a long list of Chinese providers here), Yandex, Fastmail, Zoho Mail, Hey, Protonmail and so forth.
All of the above have actually managed to capture a decent share of the market, and there are many more.
>This is more defensibile than the YouTube argument, there is Rumble and Vimeo for instance. But again, What is the market share and revenue for YouTube vs these other “competitors”?
Instagram and Facebook are also huge in the same space. I'd guess that Akamai is even bigger.
This is kind of very obviously not true.
>and YouTube
Lots of companies operating in the video delivery space too.
Paypal is kind of universally reviled over their security measures.
If AirBnB didn't do this, they would simply cease to exist at some point.
Property owners get paid with bank transfers, so clawing back the money from fraudsters is essentially impossible.
In England and Wales you merely need a reasonable belief, the person not being convicted does not automatically open you up to trouble any more than it would open up a police officer to trouble.
At no point does this blog post mention Binance, it discusses an entirely different cryptocurrency exchange.