257 karma · joined July 27, 2013
It just so happens that 2^52 nanoseconds is a little bit over 52 days.
I've seen the same thing with AMD CPUs where they hang after ~1042 days which is 2^53 10-nanosecond intervals.
Just remember to heat up the disk before writing and after storage.
https://www.ni.com/en/support/documentation/supplemental/18/...
https://www.jfsa.org.uk/uploads/5/4/3/1/54312921/technical_a...
Incidentally, it's in line with how APL code looks like an alien artifact at first, but you get used to it fast if you have spatial reasoning to wrap your head around reshaping and transposing.
There are niche expensive datacenters with higher power density, but as it stands, exotic multi-kW hardware at scale makes sense if you either save a ton on per-node licensing, or you need extreme bandwidth and/or low latency.
We don't use them generally because at the time of French Revolution, due to taxes, standardizing the state units of measurement of physical goods was a much more pressing concern than time. (If I were to guess, there were no work hours limits, and thus it just hadn't crossed the popular mind). Weeks were changed to have ten days though.
That's not to say that they hadn't tried: decimal time was mandatory for a few years before they realized that there were too many clocks around, and pushing decimal time can actually turn people hostile against the then-new metric system.
We still kinda sorta use them in form of fractions of Julian days.
I too had a few EC2 instances go down with signs of being severed from the EBS in the recent couple of weeks; mine were in eu-west.
What's worse is that the system evolved as a response to the previous similar event, and what broke now is probably not what had broken in the past.
This one is interesting because its preconditions are so trivial, and it will affect many more people than usual.
>Windows 95 is reasonably fast in performance, and is not compromised by the arguably frivolous animation and eye candy features in Windows 98 and newer versions.
>I prefer to have as much native compatibility as possible with DOS applications such as older games I own.
Of course you can do the latter if you have unlimited capital, but most companies choose the path of least resistance.
Don't know what the walkability argument is supposed to mean though: Amsterdam is famously walkable and cyclable, yet there are quite a few data centers right next to the center of the city; same goes for London.
Turns out we accidentally stretched one server VLAN too wide, to roughly 600 devices within one VLAN within one switch. The servers had more-or-less all-to-all traffic, and that was enough to generate so many ARP requests and replies that the switch's supervisor policer started dropping them at random, and after ten failed retries for one server the switch just gave up and dropped it from the ARP table.
Of course the control plane policer is global for the switch, so every device connected to the switch was susceptible, not just the ones in the overextended VLAN.
I bet every seasoned SRE has a few to add.
This is symmetrical to the nautical mile, which is one minute of arc.