2,900 karma · joined December 14, 2011
Parse -> Facebook 2013-2020, Gab 2020+
fosco at fosco dot com.
Gab, the free speech social network, deals with this topic a lot... and likewise does moderation with a flagging system, volunteers, group mods, and site mods. The community is far larger, but our policies are much simpler to compensate.
I'll reproduce a generic example I sent a friend.
Prompt:
const redis = require('redis');
// Create a redis client
Copilot suggested: const client = redis.createClient();
I accepted it and moved 2 lines down, prompt: // Get the current count from redis
Copilot suggested a start to the operation: client.get('count', (err, count) => {
I accepted it, and Copilot continued: if (err) {
console.log(err);
return;
}
// If there is no count, set it to 0
if (!count) {
count = 0;
}
// Increment the count
count++;
// Set the new count in redis
client.set('count', count);
// Log the new count
console.log(count);
}The misdirection term here is 'news feed ranking algorithm'... and what that means in the experiment versus what you might think that means, huge difference. e.g. I think most would assume the algorithm is responsible for showing you an unknown post that a friend merely liked, but it's right there in the article as still happening.
The results and how people used it don't at all say to me that they enjoyed it less, it shows explicit care & intention to curate their own feed by hiding what they don't like.. which is how it should be. If they find the group posts too overwhelming, they can mute/unfollow/leave, or other methods of grouping posts can be explored.
But look, they did this one bad science experiment, and now it's taken as fact and becomes folklore.
It's not like project owners can't still see / search / work on closed tasks. They could still maintain data elsewhere about tasks which didn't get priority, or with a click or two see every stale issue that was closed..
I used to work on OSS health, and feel very strongly it's much worse (for most projects) to have hundreds/thousands of open issues stretching years.
For some things, Wikipedia is a really bad source. Especially about things they hate.
I work at a tech company. I have responsibilities that I actually care about, and they are important to me and many others, so I could not possibly just disappear for 2 months. I can barely take a weekend off without feeling guilty.
It's not about why he wasn't there... it's that he wasn't there, for any reason. It shows that he doesn't care, and the people who picked him and allowed that to happen, also don't care.
But Ben, you're on the same side as her ideologically. You also think Facebook hasn't done enough.
It is absolutely in bad faith. Haugen is no "whistleblower", she's just another intolerant tyrant, being elevated and glorified by people with confirmation bias.
Her aims are entirely in line with Facebooks.
But I haven't paid this much attention to Facebook in over a year.