HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

german_dong

-6 karma · joined November 8, 2025

submissionscomments
german_dong··on The Emacs Widget Library: A Critique and Case Study
so-long-mode is sophomoric garbage.
german_dong··on The Emacs Widget Library: A Critique and Case Study
The buffer is the UI, rendered by Emacs's extremely optimised text display machinery

The author is known in the community as a mere packager whose knowledge of the nitty-gritty derives entirely from hearsay. Perhaps he read the long-winded preamble to xdisp.c written in 1995 boasting of all manner of optimisations. But they were written so long ago, almost no one believes most of them matter anymore, what with thirty years of bitrot.

german_dong··on The Emacs Widget Library: A Critique and Case Study
Not every modern editor. Neovim bogs on long lines too.
german_dong··on Anthropic invests $1.5M in the Python Software Foundation
I mean, it's 1.5M more than the foundation knows what to do with.
german_dong··on Ask HN: What's the best advice you received in 2025?
Use a condom.
german_dong··on Ask HN: Why is Claude Code so cheap?
Anthropic, like most frontier companies, have more money than they know what to do with. When the prize is world domination, turning a profit isn't high on their todo list. Twenty dollars per month is the bare minimum hurdle to prevent DoS bots from ruining it for the rest of us.
german_dong··on Tell HN: Time traveler tries to buy a book
They don't have hands in the future because you can stick it right in.
german_dong··on Ask HN: When was the last time you paid to call someone for support?
I was backed up for weeks, so I called a professional to clean my pipes. $120, plus a $20 tip for good technique.
german_dong··on Ask HN: In the real world we pay for everything so why not software?
That's right, but HN clapback derangement syndrome compels me to state another obvious fact of life.

Profit motive is the singlemost powerful motivator for the pharmaceutical industry. Take that away, and let's see how many smart, hard-working people work their butts off to rescue sick children.

german_dong··on Ask HN: In the real world we pay for everything so why not software?
"Tremendous societal cost" is putting it uncharitably. My country was built on the financial incentivization of patents. I can think of several economies with an open disregard for patents, even some where the state assumes ownership of all innovation, and I'm happy I live in one where IP hoarders like The Walt Disney Company continue to thrive.
german_dong··on Ask HN: How do you pronounce the name of Anthropic's series of LLMs?
I say "clawed" only because that's how it's pronounced.
german_dong··on Ask HN: How did you make yourself more marketable?
Your generalizing about the fungibility of labor yields nothing. Every successful hire is a unique mix of right place, right time, right man. You control what you can.
german_dong··on Ask HN: How did you make yourself more marketable?
Consider augmentation surgery.
german_dong··on Ask HN: What if an entire city banned home cooking?
Every woman would come from central casting. No small talk, no dinner, no funny smells, just ready-to-bang honies at your doorstep.

Pros:

* Guaranteed sex.

* No more time wasted seeking mates

* Potentially less semen wasted with bespoke receptacles.

Would you like to live in a city like this?

german_dong··on Ask HN: In the real world we pay for everything so why not software?
Many reasons:

1. Internet has made distribution frictionless. So unlike giving out Uber trips, giving out code costs you nothing.

2. You have a real job. The "80% time" for which you're paid subsidizes the self-promotional work you do for free, and let's not kid ourselves: most of us write open-source not out of altruism but for the recognition.

3. Software is immediately useful. Lawyering is a lot like programming in that both involve putting pen to paper in just the right way. But pro bono legal work is a lot more painful than whipping up some code. Lawyers have to deal with people and all their bs.

4. Software is easy. I don't know why but the return on capital blows away the return on labor. Whereas Microsoft may have once derived most of their profit from software, they've now come around to the rest of the tech industry which is selling hardware and compute -- the software that comes with it is included.

german_dong··on Richard Stallman at the First Hackers Conference in 1984 [video]
In any timeline, software, as a frictionlessly distributable commodity, would have become effectively free just as music did.
german_dong··on Ask HN: What's a book that fundamentally altered your mental models
You trippin. 1000+ pages to say greed is good, a realization most people make by fifth grade.
german_dong··on Ask HN: What's a book that fundamentally altered your mental models
Selfish Gene, of course. There is no self. We are but pre-programmed propagation vectors.
german_dong··on Richard Stallman on ChatGPT
Ergo, my initial claim that "modern approaches have zero overlap with Chomsky's deterministic methodology." Statistical token prediction began with the Dragon folks, the CMU guys, and Yorktown Heights, many of whom encountered Chomsky formalism as undergrads.
german_dong··on Richard Stallman on ChatGPT
Computational linguistics was the subfield of computer science that all the smart kids gravitated towards in the 80s and 90s (RMS came up in CSAIL during this time). While proving various results about formalisms and contrived grammars wasn't bringing in venture capital, most of the guys who would eventually bring linear algebra and stochastic methods to the field would at least have had to familiarize themselves with Chomsky's work.
german_dong··on Richard Stallman on ChatGPT
You know, when the internet made distribution frictionless, all "knowledge work," most notably music, became feasibly free. The advent of AI now threatens to make not just the distribution but also the creation of such work feasibly free. For me, RMS will always be a duplicitous shyster, not to mention a lousy programmer. I'll concede he made the world a better place, much as Robin of Locksley did, but for all the wrong reasons.
german_dong··on Richard Stallman on ChatGPT
Why do we continue to give increased weight to a guy whose computer science knowledge ends in 1980? Dude became an icon by preaching a rationalization to an all-too-receptive generation of cash poor college students: that Microsoft should work pro bono. Odd that he didn't extrapolate that principle to other "secret sauce" enterprises like Coca Cola or KFC.
german_dong··on Richard Stallman on ChatGPT
No, modern approaches have zero overlap with Chomsky's deterministic methodology..
german_dong··on Lawyers are uniquely well-placed to resist AI job automation
Like a lot of professional talkers, you've gone off on a long-winded, narcissistic pontification, 90% of which I didn't read. But shortly before Claude Pro went mainstream, I was dealing with my parents' estate and the procedural opacity (obfuscation?) had me very close to pulling the trigger on hiring a lawyer. After I signed up for Claude Pro, knowing what and how to file various documents became far more tractable, almost enjoyable.
german_dong··on The Free Software Foundation Europe deleted its account on X
The only way to get attention on X is to announce you're leaving it. Well played, whoever you are.
german_dong··on Ask HN: How did you get your first paying customers
At the time I had just enough pink and lift in my cheeks for quid pro quo.
german_dong··on EmacsConf 2025
GP is a longstanding pita in the emacs community who has yet to come to terms that FOSS is an financial black hole.
german_dong··on Ask HN: What has been your experience with Agentic Coding?
I have to externalize the mental model so the AI can operate with it.

Just as writing clarifies thinking, so does this. That's not a cost, that's a prudent investment.

german_dong··on Ask HN: Battling Depression
I go get my dick wet on backpage. Hey, you asked.
german_dong··on Claude Status – Elevated error rates on the API
When not having Claude feels like you left your phone at home, I'd say no, using AI is very much a part of our identities.
Page 1 of 2Next →