4,412 karma · joined April 7, 2009
I suppose we humans are so good at reading between the lines, that we will see meaning where there is none.
As you point out, I would prefer to parse a text string as early as possible, so that I could pass around structured data instead of having to parse the same string over and over.
That seems so obvious that I can't imagine what the author meant.
So I painstakingly ground down some charcoal to fine dust and redid the same experiment. That gave a much more impressive boom, but no dust plume, which puzzled me until I learned about dust explosions.
https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/3e786n/chinese_hair_...
On the other hand, a lot of people become extremely put off by the smallest sign of ai slop. And the llms have a tendency to impart their style to any text they touch.
I'm pretty sure the Ellsworth translation is in the corpus. You basically instructed claude to regurgitate it.
The llms all have the more famous books memorized. You can trick them to recite them more or less word for word.
Exactly. "hallucinations" are not some special case. They are the LLM working as designed.
A ton of industrial equipment are still using win 3.1.
If the bots take everything they read at face value, how useful are they really?
He is both, but it’s irrelevant in this context.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
That’s exactly what git is.