That said, it makes a lot of sense that a marketing video helps people learn more about your product, get more excited, and feel more comfortable taking the desired action.
848 karma · joined October 15, 2009
email: greg@wefunder.com
twitter: @gbelote
blog: https://blog.gregbelote.com/
Feel free to email me if you want mediocre startup advice.Currently doing:
Wefunder https://wefunder.com/ (YC W13)
Past: TutorialTab http://tutorialtab.com/ (TechStars Boston 2010)
gameroom.io http://gameroom.io/
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/gbelote; my proof: https://keybase.io/gbelote/sigs/pcnipO-1fNit0nur-RtpNelcGBQO7SNstkofnTacntg ]That said, it makes a lot of sense that a marketing video helps people learn more about your product, get more excited, and feel more comfortable taking the desired action.
The problem for me isn't not knowing how to meet new people (e.g. going to interesting meetups), it's getting past the social anxiety of leaving the house and trying to make friends from strangers. At a glance, your app doesn't help solve that -- it looks like another kind of meetup aggregator (albeit a more casual one). While it may be something else and/or technically be a perfectly great service to help me, it doesn't seem like it helps me get past the irrational mental resistance of going somewhere uncomfortable. So when I look at your page and see headers like "GROOOVY FOR IPHONE" and "WE'RE LAUNCHING SOON" and see what looks like a list view of a calendar, it doesn't get me excited. I eventually noticed that clicking the little circles lets me look at different "pages", but that feels like work and I lost interest quickly.
In the case of RT analytics, there's probably very small practical difference between 1s and 30s: it's typically dwarfed by the reaction time of the observer (what advantage is there in reacting 29s seconds sooner?).
In the case of something like a stock trading tool, 29s could make a huge difference and it's not practically the same as knowing instantly.
That's a good point about fairness and casual vs serious, it makes a lot of sense.
Gifting is interesting, I first noticed it with reddit. If you don't mind me asking, why did you pay for your friends on Tribal Wars?
I personally don't mind the negatives and enjoy the extra real estate, but it's certainly not for everyone.
The difference between filesharing and BC is that in the former the value is in the files, but BC is only valuable if you can trade them for something you value.
They could instrument whatever library they use to interact with AWS and make it report failures or fail to respond to "create new instance"-like commands.
You might want to consider capturing what camp folks are in when they sign up so you get a better sense of the distribution before releasing your beta. You might find that it's very lopsided.
I've read criticisms about not being able to quickly/easily filter out top comments (which I care about, too). But there might be other (better?) ways of achieving that without reverting back to scored comments. For example, coloring/annotating comments that cross a certain threshold (either an absolute number, or relative to the other comments in the post). The advantage of color is that it becomes easier to visually filter out highly voted comments.
One thing that helps me: focus on the good feeling when you accomplish something and think about how you're going to get there.
Also I have a framed picture of this - http://www.someecards.com/workplace-cards/when-work-feels-ov...
I don't see why AdWords couldn't work if you built the right experiment. For example, a simple email-capturing landing page with a price tag doesn't touch on it as much as personally talking to people and finding 30 who will (not would, as Jason emphasizes) pay at that price. You can learn a lot from just talking to folks, and an AdWords campaign could help you get in touch with the right people.
Most startups struggle to get awareness. A very abstract tag line (e.g. "Do it the fun way") doesn't really help with that problem. Your customers are different too -- a "mainstream" audience is more moved by what feels good than early adopters (who, generally speaking, are trying to satisfy a "pain point").
Apple in 1997 was very well known. They were competing with PCs in a technical way (e.g. faster computers), and it wasn't working very well. Their shift in marketing was to build a stronger Apple brand and make more of an emotional pitch. It turned out to be a more powerful differentiator and was longer-lasting than focusing on the benefits of a particular product.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2281824 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2281966
And FWIW my startup is in Cambridge too and I really like it here.
On the flip side I've found bootstrapping to be a viable option in Boston/Cambridge. There's enough demand for developers that it's reasonable to find good contracting gigs (light long-term or heavy short-term). A couple hours a week or a few packed weeks makes it so you can stay afloat without being at the mercy of Boston investors.