Ok, time to rethink the email opt-ins.
1,142 karma · joined March 8, 2010
Ok, time to rethink the email opt-ins.
We're really focused on trying to "twist the knobs" only up to the point right /before/ it starts getting annoying.
We've been working on some /tech/ to enable tiered pricing in the meantime. The Site's all custom, and so far there's no notion of a "product" yet...just "paid" and "unpaid."
Share your question re: where's Kaplan on this stuff!
And eager to receive any feedback.
Thanks for the post!
I like /coding interview/ resources for this, because they skip the proofs and get to the point faster.
Cracking the coding interview is good So is interviewcake.com (disclosure: I made it)
I like how Rob Bell's piece has headings with the most common time costs--sorta makes it easier to see at a glance what you're going to get, and I imagine gives folks a quick sense of, "Right, I've seen that! Been /wondering/ what that means."
It's very easy for a company to make vague non-promises like this. Consider how you would feel if it took 1 year or 2 years or infinite years for that "getting a bit more into actual software development" thing to happen. Would you quit after a year of waiting? Would you feel like you had wasted your time?
Something to consider.
"I buy a t-shirt >>"
This is my new favorite web copy trope.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130302051347/http://graylog2.o...
Sad to see it's gone all "professional" now :(
The web service had some hilarious bits too. Does it still say "enraging gorillas... | mounting party hats" etc when you log in?
(I'mma wait on pushing the fix until traffic dies down a bit.)
Almost.
Anyone understand why this is? Is there a reason I shouldn't let my users use Apple Pay to buy the freemium digital content on my website?
I don't quite understand what capitalized In-App Purchases means...oh, maybe Apple Pay is only possible from an app, not from a mobile web browser? Is that true? (But like, why?)
I'm really interested in solutions for visually explaining what an algorithm does. Anyone have any other resources they like?
One great optimization skeuocard has is it only asks for the cc# at first, then the other fields appear as you type it in. So the form is less daunting at first.
That being said, I think these whiteboard problems can be useful when you think of them as "trying out what it feels like to brainstorm with the candidate about how to solve a problem." That's how I think of them. There are plenty of people I just can't get on the same page with when trying to whiteboard together (different communication styles/speeds/whatever), and it's helpful to know that ahead of time.
The problems are definitely a bit more advanced. I do try to make sure that any "vocab words" (data structures, algorithm types) can be clicked on for a deeper explanation. But if you haven't seen big-o before, for example, you'll be in the dark on a few things right now. I have some more "bottom-up" curriculum that I've developed from teaching at boot camps around San Francisco, and I'm still working on figuring out the best way to present it on the site.
For Big-o specifically (the thing that looks like "O(n)"), I really like these resources: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/487258/plain-english-expl... http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=227909 http://www.daveperrett.com/articles/2010/12/07/comp-sci-101-...
Best of luck!