69 karma · joined September 5, 2015
This is how I see it too. It is in my self interest to be caring of others and do it some times at a loss for myself. While there are many times I haven't bothered if I stood to gain from an activity that caused loss to someone else. That was the game I was playing.
I understood Rand as if each of us truly focus on our individual needs then the world will be a better place.
The world is lot shittier because there are lots of people who seem to think they know what someone else wants.
But that is not the case. Which suggest Google isn't that good at productivizing stuff.
But most times, I want to use the phone just to make/receive calls/text & have good battery. No need for a big display or other stuff.
I would add white privilege or majority privilege to that... quite a few blokes get a seat at the table cause they identify with the majority group or vice versa.
I have seen this attitude several times and these guys are selling the products/services produced by such minions for real market value while the minions think they have hot the jackpot with the video game consoles. I keep telling such folk to charge top dollar and f&^*ing donate the unwanted money to charity or a struggling video game startup..
and the inferences from those evidence is that women are predisposed to studies that involve human interactions and very less evidence that social factors play a part...
infact it is in unequal societies( relatively speaking) where social factors play a part that forces women to consider professions like CS.
1. http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/a_funny_thing_happe...
2. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1vuho8/the_docu...
as evidenced by this doco on the "Gender Equality" paradox https://vimeo.com/19707588
The Indian form of greeting of Namaste as opposed to Hand shake is one such practice...