gadflyinyoureye

That's where genz and millennials come in. We need to put aside our differences on a great many thing to organize around building a better future for the US.

US voters can demand policy change. We have to have a political movement to stem the corruption.

Video argues that AI is not at the root of the layoffs...well at least not what one normally means by AI.

Let's be a bit gracious. A big issue is how much value is destroyed forcing people who don't necessarily want to live in a big city to live in a big city. Take Dallas. If you condense it into a 10 mile super city, you lose the sprawl. You gain a short commute, maybe? But you now have people sitting on top of each other. Is this good? No more sprawl, sure. But good?

Go to Google's AI studio. Drop that link in it. Ask it for a transcript or summary. Wait a minute. Then read.

But is there grounds to say that as a conglomerate they pose a large harm to market health to merit a breakup? For example, few regulators want to break up Mondragon.

I haven't seen anyone talking about low T. My doctor has found that many millennials and z have T under 300. One of his patients was about to divorce because he didn't want sex. A San ball change in diet and exercise saved that marriage.

Now look at the world of singles. T increase risk taking. What if we have several generations of low T and therefore loss desire for risk. Let's exclude the modern reality of women posting men who approach them to social media as if they are creeps. No T means no risk taking.

And they will trip over the remains 20% percent for the rest of their days.

To be fair, the original SS age was at the high end of the actuary tables. As science extended life, society failed to move the line of retirement.

Citation needed.

It seems like we need to use forceful language with these things now. I've had copilot censor everything I asked it. Finally I had to to say, "listen you cracked up piece of shit, help me generate a uuid matcher. "

Wood used in framing has a small r value because of the air. The timber on the exterior prevents all the energy transfer.

The loss of r value can be off set with two 2x4 frames. As strong as a 2x6 wall and about the same price. Added benefit is air gaps.

This is a logical fallacy of whataboutism. It is perfectly possible to say that the DOD gets too much money as does Harvard.

I look forward to it. I listened to her a lot recently because YouTube decided ever “next video” bump while I drove should be her.

It was both. Musk said there would be pain for the short term. Trump promised the long game.

Also you were outvoted because the Dems didn't have a reasonable alternative. Mrs Harris was incompetent. She was a poor public speaker, which further made her look incompetent given her previous role as a prosecutor. Further, the Dems didn't offer her as part of an open primary. They forced her on everyone.

The US presently suffers from future shock and stilted political process. We need more parties and better voting options both in the HR department and the mechanical process like ranked voting.

Since both parties benefit from the status quo, we shall see no change.

It’s harder to do in a Western world. For example say that it’s cheaper to live in Indiana. The cost of moving from Texas, if you do it yourself, is about $4k. For many people that is considered too expensive. As a result they stay in place, which causes them to mentally collapse into anxiety or depression.

Another issue is the trend of return to office. There were people who moved to less expensive locations. They are now being required to come into the office. One guy with whom I work is spending about $1k a month on gas to do this. So now he is effectively losing $12k per year to keep his job. If he moves, he loses his lifestyle and his 3% mortgage. This puts him in a tight spot.

Congress probably allowed the bombings in some overly large bill that gave expansive power to the administration to interpret threats to the US as it sees fit. The war equivalent of the Chevron ruling.

Flutter widget design.

Tuesday. But I have odd hobbies.

Yes. That’s what he does.

That’s not how Trump will spin this. He’s going to pander to some idea of right to move between territorial holdings. He can whip his base up to request an invasion. There are few republicans that are willing to stand up to Trump. That’s why we have the idiocy of impeachment against judges.

Well if Trump is looking for a reason to invade, he’ll have one he can promote. I don’t agree with it it, but he can say, “they’re cutting us off from our people!” Then he’ll invade BC to form a contiguous border to all our territories.

Hell based on the representatives going to DC to discuss making Alberta a state, he’ll probably gin up even more support.

No. Modern kids in the US were trained on short form articles. As a result they experience anxiety when as to read a single book per semester. They really hate being asked to read multiple books per semester for just one class.

Is that because we’d bring standards back? Harvard is finding that students can’t read books. https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/10/why-elite-students-ca...

Should the government get a blank check? If there is waste and removing it won’t reduce efficacy, it should be purged.

Yep. 5 eggs a day between my wife and I. Then there are uses for food prep.

Please go on. You’ve made many claims there. Please elaborate.

You don’t think of those other two having their shit together. — Archer international man of mystery.

I like this idea, but doubt it works. People naturally coalesce around ideas. That cohesion is then call a political party. The only way to get rid of parties is to get rid of freedom of organization.