B-2 Spirit Stealth Bombers Begin Unannounced Deployment to Diego Garcia
theaviationist.com
theaviationist.com
So, if US hit Iran, we have to watch out for escalation from Russia and China.
Russia does not want to get into a 1:1 shooting war with the US--especially now that it has a puppet in the WH. Russia has always done what was laid out in GP. It has previously been doing this in Iran, Syria, etc.
"On the other hand, we are also mindful of the low baserate for a US administration directly attacking Iran. We also considered modelling the administration as being dispositionally very over the top."
Reminds how in June 1941 Stalin had morning schedule for the June 22th of the German troops amassed near USSR border, yet he was saying it weren’t German war plans ...
Whoopsie Daisy
If we're using them for Yemen, wouldn't the b-1b be better and cheaper. Much lower operating costs and almost double the payload?
Flying from Diego Garcia means they can takeoff without anyone reporting them inbound.
The biggest they have is the GBU-57A/B [1] and that will work until 60 meters reinforced concrete. Iran has the facilities under more than 80 to 100 meters and its granite.
Even an upgraded GBU-57A/B that it seems exist, wont be good enough.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-57A/B_MOP
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fordow_Fuel_Enrichment_Plant
> The biggest conventional munition they have
Two of them, behind each other, are Jack Hammers mother.
Take four, and what's left is flour.
Oink Oink.
Forward deployment is to allow transit and arrival entirely over-water.
edit: wonder if there is a phased laser "radar" where it spams a bunch of uniform dots and if some of them don't come back then there's something there
probably wouldn't work, scattering
the other one would be LEO cameras that are scanning the ground for a black dorito
maybe captures aerial disturbance/lines in the sky density change
More than 4 and they are only visiting.
This is plainly stated in the opening of the article:
>Diego Garcia is now the only known location to use the distinctive B2SS or B-2 Shelter System clamshell-style hangars. These hangars are air transportable and can be constructed in around 70 days. RAF Fairford previously had one B2SS hangar, but it was removed after being damaged in high winds (the base still retains two permanent B-2 hangars, similar to those at Whiteman AFB).
Not the small one, this thing is massive can fuel two F35s at the same time
And how are we bombing at all without Congress declaring war?
And why are we attacking people that are specifically threats to the Saudis and not USA?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Milit...
Remember when a bunch of people were complaining that tons of that legislation was dangerous crap that handed way too much power to the executive? Yeah, they were 100% right.
(checks notes)
... the end of World War 2?
Also, an attack in Yemen is a message to Iran.
Also #2, "Trump sends second aircraft carrier to Middle East in ramp up against Houthis"
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/21/trump-air-craft-car...
As for comments like "why move them there, they're built for attacking from the US?": sustained strikes. The mission in the linked article had the crews awake 33 hours and put tons of strain on their aircraft, all of which would lengthen the time to a follow-up flight to, I'd guess, several days at least. You do this if you are planning to (or want it to look like you're planning to) use the aircraft several times in within a single week.
In this case, they can just roll right in.
Whether they are stealth or not, they are B-2 bombers, their purpose is to bomb.
Whatever can drop the payload. The more the merrier.
All that and the fact that we know that B2 stealth bombers have already been used against Yemen, even during the Biden admin.
Article author doesn't seem to be well-informed of this making that statement.
When it comes to striking fear in the enemy, overkill is practical.
A strike on them to correct their malicious behavior is far away from a global war.
I didn't see much concern about Ukraine leading to WW3 until Trump allowed peace talks to start.
During the Biden administration peace was not discussed and not even considered an option by many.
Deterrence sometimes means applying force.
Iran won't be able to do anything if the US actually applies force to them.
And I highly doubt anyone will actually come to their defense, which is an ingredient for WW3.
I think forcing Israel to maintaining their ceasefire is a significantly easier way of unblocking the water passageways.
You know, with a bonus of preventing hundreds of people being killed everyday in Gaza too.
Trump has regularly used WW3 rhetoric about Ukraine:
2022: https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-warns-world-war-3-accide...
2023: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-world-war-iowa-waterlo...
2024: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...
I was talking about everyone that said the gist of "if we allow peace talks, Russia wins", mainly here.
It's the sentiment that led to the war persisting for these last few years.
No talks from the Biden admin, no public outrage, just support. And constant funding to continue it.
I have never seen this... anywhere.
Edit: for the people, like the commenter below, who happens to be unaware about that major piece of the war (in particular these drones have been the main tool devastating Ukrainian infrastructure)
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-says-russia-lau...
I'm not asking for much here, I just want any potential path of escalation, and everyone can judge for themselves how likely it is. If the US performs airstrikes against Iran, what can Iran do that would make WW3 more likely?
A ground invasion of Iran seems extremely difficult, and would be very unpopular, and it's still unclear how that would lead to a wider world conflict.
Regarding räydiäyshun alone, there have been 512 atmospheric nuclear weapons tests since 1945, and were still here. Maybe with a little bit higher cancer rate, but that could have been caused by many other things, by unwise introduction of byproducts of industrialisation. Hrmm. Lemme ssink...industry...oh yeah, coal power! Even moar räydiäshun!1!! Whee!
Then there is the theory of Hormesis. Which could be applied to at least some forms of weak radiation, in spite of only a few very vocal, nay-saying kooks. See many places around the world, were people are bathing and breathing in radone-rich caves and waters, or beaches in Brazil.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Gastein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsqaltubo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramsar,_Iran
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guarapari
and many more, just without entry in the global cybernetic landfill.
So, away with the 'glo-in-ze-dark' stuff, except for one last thing:
Spontane Verdampfung führt zur Entkrampfung! (Spontaneous evaporation leads to relaxation)
Hrmyah, whaddäbbout WW3? Depending on where you are, that already happened, when seen as total devastation of ones environment. Does it matter when it glows in the dark by itself? Does it have to, to make ones situation even more miserable? Do I care?
No. I prefer a rather cold, zoomed out view, as envisioned in the commandments of the Georgia Guidestones, proudly riding my trusty Blucifer.
Ze Ztarz! My Destination! (One way or another, I don't bother)
Now please excuse me, I need to have the snake tatto reapplied to my dick, otherwise Jizzbella disapproves...…
As far as I understand, in addition to the main targets, Israel also knocked out a good number of the air defense systems Iran had at the time.
Given russia can't even replace their own losses of sam systems I personally doubt that they are sending much to Iran.
It is an inherent property of low frequency radar that it is not precise enough for weapons targeting. You can't engineer that away.
That being said, these aircraft aren't invincible. If you could visually see the B2, you might be able to essentially hip-fire a SAM at it and hope it eventually picks up some signal as it gets close, but that would be pretty unlikely to work and some missiles might not be capable of doing that at all. There are some soviet systems that are optically guided, and those would probably work fine. In the day at least. Heat seeking A2A missiles would probably also work, though the B2 has some mitigations there. All these options are a significantly limited engagement range though, and I would hope B2s aren't sent alone. A few F35s with the strike would fix all problems. SEAD is way easier when the enemy's radars can barely detect you at 60km. US anti-radiation weapons can reach out to over 100km easily, though even basic SAM doctrine can limit their "Reach out and ruin someone's day" ability.
Meanwhile this entire situation is pathetic. The signal leak demonstrates that even Trump's admin knows that Europe and Israel can handle this themselves, which they insist we shouldn't pay for, and then burn money doing. We couldn't afford $100 billion a year in old, explicitly deprecated systems like Gulf War era Bradleys and weapon systems we stopped using because they aren't that great but are definitely better than nothing and CERTAINLY better than the trucks and golf carts Russia is using, but we can afford $150k per B2 flight hour to turn yet more of the desert into craters.
[1]https://www.airandspaceforces.com/b-2-stealth-bombers-strike...
That said, it was interesting to see how they determined that the movement occurred.
Every submission and every comment. He does....
I see what you did there...