74 karma · joined January 19, 2026
Here's a hypothesis: The fact that the same operation has half a dozen different names makes it sound like there is a lot to learn. If I am totally familiar with fold, and i come upon a reduce, I may need to think more about what's going on, which is distracting.
I don't think map and filter have so many synonyms? I know select for filter, but it seems to me less common.
I don't know how many people felt like I did, versus how many ragequit the game.
After some years I became a wormholer though, and finally a permanent -10 lowsec pirate in the end. It's been a decade since I quit now.
Learned a lot from that game.
Besides that blocker, your idea sounds like a nice win.
With the constraint that you simply don't have a mouse available, vim turned out to be faster from day 1 than alternative editors. Even knowing just a couple of vim movements.
And then I liked it and wanted to learn more.
Does it exist if it is impossible to show an example? Only if "exist" is interpreted to mean "you cannot deduce a contradiction from assuming them", which is a logically consistent position. But if you mean "they are in some sense actually there", in some describable way, then it's muddier. And you can build a logically consistent position from declaring "they are not there" as well. Precisely because no counterexample can be produced.
And then there's ultrafinitists, and yeah, they are a bit bonkers.
"tears" 6.00570508021708 "teras" 5.95925128791865 "teals" 5.90122552646963 "tares" 5.88711668336419 "lears" 5.86158270234831
Using another metric which I called consistency (I think it was just minimizing the biggest bucket possible afterwards, trying to beat absurdle fast), the best starting word was tied between "arise", "raise", "aesir", "reais" and "serai". All of these have a worst-case scenario of 168 valid words remaining.
I find it interesting that different implementations seem to come up with slightly different rankings. Maybe the dictionaries are different?
I feel like I am missing a lot.
If I remember correctly, it claim is that about 50% of all labour over the course of history has gone into making textiles. More than food!
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death...
(And to those who haven't encountered this before, I strongly recommend a watch. It may be the greatest tech talk of all time, for certain values of greatest.)
They probably won't.
It does make complete sense, doesn't it?...
I guess this is kind of the recursive version of the purported phenomenon, but, are we sure all those comments aren't just bot generated outrage so people can have big engagement by feeling superiour or whatever?
Should we also be expecting to see bleed-over of Indian English into generic English LLMs? Or is it not relatively large enough compared to America to force it, unlike Brazil to Portugal?
But looking at the depression and alcoholism data, it also seems to be true!
This is really confusing!