froddd

Roadio is primarily a camera and costs around $265 USD. The Garmin is also a camera and also costs over $300 USD. Neither reports to a central service to map the results for other users.

Alongside the quality of life and mental health improvements, too — some clear positives.

“Be’er” seems like even less work. For some people

Reducing the problem to ‘people coming from overseas’ is an equally reductionist argument.

There are properties going unused, for very many reasons. Second homes, holiday homes, etc. This also drives the price of properties up. This is one of the inputs to the problem. Planning permission laws is another input. The size and change of size of the people needing housing is another input.

Sticky desktop notifications don’t work on macOS on FF, which means event notifications from calendar apps disappear within a few seconds, leaving no time to snooze them or act on them in any other way. Queue missed meetings.

What about a surname like ‘Collinson’ — if ‘Collins’ is issued from this process already, would this be another layer of it?

That’s a rabbit hole level of interesting! Thanks for sharing!

That quote is Georges Clemenceau, not Charles De Gaulle. He was a French politician, but long before De Gaulle.

I get that, and it’s a good point. But at some point that easy patch/minor version bump becomes a major version with a breaking change, and does take time to upgrade regardless, scary delta and such. My point is that, without an actual feature need or an actual vulnerability (none of these guaranteed to spring up in future), any time spent upgrading is potentially wasted. I know some projects are unlikely to last beyond a few years —- in those cases I think the risk is calculated enough to not matter too much.

On such popular and packages, one should reasonably expect security holes to be found and made public with relatively little delay. At that point, upgrading becomes relevant.

The main question should always be: why update?

Should a library become compromised with a vulnerability, fine (if said vulnerability is relevant to your usage). If you need a feature only available in a newer version, fine (I’m counting better performance as a feature).

What I’m seeing far too much of is upgrading for the sake of it. It feels like such a waste of dev time. Pinning dependencies should be absolutely fine.

It’s a strong business case for the founders

Undelivered letters could be returned to sender.

In which case… there would definitely be no need to instruct to not write anything below the line, as nobody would have opened the letter.

I’ve worked a 4 day week for a few years now. Best decision I’ve had the chance to make. I feel more productive on those 4 days, and my time away from work is more fulfilled too.

I always recommend it to people who may be lucky enough to afford and choose it.

Is there a source for this? Is this source heavily context-dependant?

I’m not sure why this is getting downvoted. It’s perfectly reasonable to assume that the difficulty in side loading another OS is incidental, rather than designed. A citation would help support the opposite assumption made above.

> users of apps and services with chat functions are to be asked whether they accept the indiscriminate and error-prone scanning and possibly reporting of their privately shared images, photos and videos

I take it this should apply to any web comments and messaging platform, and therefore require that all websites and web services comply if they can be accessed within the EU?

I’m not sure how that’s even remotely doable.

In the UK roadwork sites usually remain much longer than it takes for the result to start deteriorating once they have finished.

Being able to cover/scramble your actual or virtual location can provide security in some contexts

So, should they be requested to do so by a formally issued court order, they would comply and start logging a user’s activity, but do not do so by default.

Calling them worthless at providing secure browsing seems far-fetched; calling them a scam is fully disingenuous.

Can you expand on that? Specifically the affiliation with Nordic countries?

I’m a Nord VPN customer, I’d quite like to know more — may help inform any future decision on renewing or even staying with them.

Or “dreary”, or “dear”, or “deer”. Unfortunate choice for the example!

Marketing.

“We want to address them by their first name because it’s so much friendlier and personable”.

That’s all I can think of. Not exactly ‘decent’.

Do you own a USB-C thumb drive?

…

Me neither :-/

The fact I find most fascinating is that they have a local district heating system reusing heat produced from local industry. That’s efficiency on another level.

Ruined the whole tech achievement for me. Great technical approach, rather slim on the creativity. Shame.

Nothing in the article says Apple will void warranty on an iPhone if water has been detected in the charging port (water damage is a different thing entirely). This concerns Mac computers, which are not sold as waterproof.

Every element has _implied_ semantic attributes, which can be extended/overridden by using the `role` and some `aria-` attributes.

For instance, the `<button>` element has a default `role` of `button`, to indicate that it is a button, that can be clicked, and will perform an action when that is done. The role can be changed, for instance to `link`, to indicate that it now functions as a link. Similarly, a paragraph tag (`<p>`) can be assigned a role of `button`.

It’s very easy to abuse this, but it also means the underlying markup is a lot clearer, IMO. This may not be true to people who are not used to or don’t know about the semantic side of HTML, but herein lies a lot of the associated knowledge of that syntax, often unfortunately overlooked, sometimes leading to HTML being derided as a “beginner’s language”. There is a huge amount of knowledge around HTML.

Every element has a function or hierarchy in the document. The ‘semantic’ association helps define that role. This is useful for technologies that rely on something else than the visual output of the document, for instance, screen readers.

As an example, a heading might contain the content: “A brief summary”. Without a semantic role, this does not convey the hierarchical position of that element within the document. Using the correct tag (in this case, `h{1|2…}` does provide this extra information and helps provide structure to the document.

Genuine question: is it the act of recording that is illegal or is it the publishing of recorded material where this applies?