575 karma · joined December 26, 2024
They won't I suspect. If there isn't any good way to give them a good smack for doing it then I don't know what would make them stop.
These are pointless growth levers.
Explain please. I might agree with discounted.
It was 47% 47%. AMA!! I've got stories man, just give me a specific prompt. I can also tell stories about my PhD advisor (100% german, 70% autistic).
I'm missing what was the way of testing for equivalency. Seems a crucial step in understanding the overall story.
I'm wondering if adding extra checks can hamper future efforts at production, because you are going to nail down your tests today. Then in the future some crucial part of the process is technically impossible due to upstream shortages. You didn't understand your wiggle room when you locked down your tests (potentially).
Can you clarify what this would even mean? And could you provide a source (because I couldn't)?
Light investigation says it is selectively applied for national security. So... pretty big loophole.