foolrush

Bzzt. False. All “crime” is a sociological construct. In your second case, are there laws in some cultures that permit you to stab your neighbour such as in the case of “self defence”? Yes.

How the nuance of those laws are defined is a social, cultural, and political exercise in power.

Because “crimes” are sociological constructs of a culture.

The same lack of critical analysis behind your question was also missing in the responses to Lombroso’s work in the late 19th century[1], essentializing and legitimating phrenology.

[1] https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/the-born-crimi...

Your ability to create the ontology of “What is political” versus “What is not political” classification is one of privilege.

“Food isn’t political” is only “not political” for someone who is well fed and not concerned about where their next meal is coming from.

Everything is political.

Life is dice.

Many countries with a tremendous backbone in journalistic research have done pretty well using public funded news.

The BBC and it’s ilk was a beacon for years. The trope is exhausting.

Nothing can currently, without a display that was fully spectral, and that doesn’t exist.

Seems a little lean on the color science front. colour-science.org could have done all of this, with much greater focus on the science.

Write protect == hole punch

Writable == tape

Find me someone who used 5.25 who didn’t do this and I’ll fight you.

As a counterpoint:

“The richest families in Florence in 1427 are still the richest families in Florence”

https://qz.com/694340/the-richest-families-in-florence-in-14...

Surgeons are not billionaires. Surgeons are trained.

Billionaires are not magical unicorns, and in fact are byproducts of nothing more than birthright, chance, and a culture that cultivates them.

Then mobilize against them.

This isn’t inevitable, despite the framing they spend many dollars to convince you of such.

Because every idea that suggests change from the status quo is wild and untenable, yet legislation that benefits the corporations and billionaires can happen extremely swiftly, almost without friction, nor even legislative discussion.

It’s not succinct to suggest that the wealth hoarding cannot be taxed. It’s not wild. It’s not untenable.

The onus of taxation being thrust upon the individual has been following a characteristic curve since the Great Depression. It was happening prior to that, with only WWII levelling it out.

Wild and untenable ideas are only wild and untenable because of the suffocating ideology that instructs you as such.

Uh you are aware of the history of the swastika, right?

It’s an epistemology / ontology question, as folks familiar with the humanities would spot in little time. Aka it’s not “data” until something empowers the created metric a meaning.

The map is not the territory.

https://www.amazon.com/Raw-Data-Oxymoron-Infrastructures/dp/...

I’m not sure that clipboard implementations provide ancillary metadata? Nor would it be interpreted given the wild-west application development model where application developers are the folks who would need to implement support?

Historicize.

Medicalization.

Read the research. Read the links. Study sociology. When you invent a metric and model, you imbue it with bias.

“Objective” is something that has been up for debate since the dawn of epistemology. It hasn’t been solved yet. It’s also worth understanding the Demarcation Problem.

You aren’t wrong, and yet you get downvoted.

SAT tests are rooted in eugenics theory. IQ testing, despite the original developer warning of incorrect application, was weaponized in that direction.

Yet here you find yourself getting voted down.

https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=h...

https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Intelligence-Testing-a...

https://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/01/assessment

Deeper inspection reveals that both are tagged sRGB, which indicates they are for demonstrative purposes only.

I believe both A and B are at work; it's probably a direct copy of the input buffer without metadata making B likely impossible, if it were trying at all, which I'll speculate isn't even a possibility.

The transform to display the "solid red" block is actually the post-transformed data. The clipboard (rightfully) is carrying the original source buffer.

The issue would be the mechanics of the copy (attaching metadata) and pasting (interpreting the metadata in conjunction with the source image buffer.)

So technically, no, there's no conversion on the source data, it's the representation in the pasted context that's the issue.

Correct.

Haven't looked at the image too deeply, but this is likely the rendering intent being set so something other than the colorimetric offerings, such as Perceptual or Saturation. It could also be a poorly encoded image as well.

2015 MacBooks are not Display P3. What browser are you using, as that is incorrect behaviour.

The clipboard here is probably copying the image buffer in the untransformed state, and pasting it into MSPaint would dump those values incorrectly.

It's not entirely about bit depth. Think about 1 bit of a given colour light, it can turn on or off, but the bit depth doesn't tell us anything about the colour of the light it is turning on or off.

Encoding in a larger volume colour space may require additional bit depth to prevent posterization, but that's somewhat tangential. The larger issue is the number of vendors and operating systems that can't get it right. Windows is horrific, for example, with Android being at least as bad, as given by the accounts in the comments here.

And have properly set up colour management working, which on Windows is close to zero percent probability.

This also ignores the shortcuts that Chrome and other browsers have taken on their road to colour management.

Is that not simply hypermodern school with the fianchettoed bishops?

Amazing how no one is answering your question.

“The Secrets of the Russian Chess Masters: Fundamentals of the Game” https://www.amazon.com/Secrets-Russian-Chess-Masters-Fundame...

Don’t let the title deter you; hitting a wall is almost always about fundamentals, which at 1000 points is a heady topic. Great series. Graduate to Jeremy Silman’s books.

Precisely.

Reinforced yearly, daily, and minutely by the constructs of media.

See Lyotard and his notion of Grand Narratives. The uniquely American Self Made Man conveniently overlooks wealth accumulated by men vis a vis free labour. To constrict these men, to suggest their wealth wasn’t “earned”, is to deny the other men of lesser social position of the “opportunity” to do so themselves.

That is, the myth perpetuates the energy that permits the men running these insurance companies to make billions. All reinforced by the whimsical meth-addled pipe dream that “I could be king too, one day” of the legion of white men of lesser caste.

Because epistemology is simple. /facepalm

Postmodernism posits a plurality of truths, as well as underscores the demarcation problem.

Postmodernism is a toolset, and the thinkers who are bunched together under its umbrella, frequently unwillingly, point out the issues with late rationalist epistemology.

That is, the postmodernists are responsible for attempting to show the rest of the people that the boat has severe cracks. Fascists and right wing authoritarianism has already been exploiting the cracks forever.

Blaming postmodernism for anything is laughable. It’s not a cause, it’s a series of well informed observations.

https://reallifemag.com/faked-out/