You're arguing that he shouldn't, only you have no leverage to do so.
47 karma · joined November 23, 2022
What's wrong with this?
Also, learn to mute channels we have thousands too, I'm in about 20-50 at a given time between pruning. Out of those I only keep important, low noise channels unmuted.
The evidence is incredibly clear on this. It doesn't. No mask wearing has resulted in less COVID transmission on any population around the world.
N95 masks are the only things that work - but they don't fog your glasses.
I feel like a lot of the kneejerk responses here are failing to read the context of my comment here correctly.
Stating comparisons isn't hyperbole just because you don't like the comparison. Neither is it a conspiracy theory. Five eyes shitfuckery is extremely well documented.
https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
My two 80% full 1tb laptops and 1tb desktop backup to around 300-400G after dedupe and compression. Currently have around 12tb of backups stored in that 300G.
Incremental backups run in about 5 mins even against the spinning disk's they're stored on.
It's also 100% on topic. You not liking the discussion doesn't change that.
Stop using DWR. Buy frogtoggs or Columbia outdry and leave this stuff behind.
Outdry is lighter stronger, doesn't wear off after three outings, and the material breathes better than a wetted out goretex jacket ever will.
Unless you're in snow, goretex is next to useless.
> the punchline is that they're all using a different 20%.
You could try creating different products.
They never used to bother Sydney very much until one bird, yes one, was brought into the city on a boat. It managed to get back to it's home land, the next year, hundreds of them migrated into the city and raided the abundant food available in the cities bins.
These aren't stupid birds, they're intelligent and communicate with their peers about food availability.
The problem is, the alternative is this stuff runs rampant on their service, not something I'd want either.
So I understand their position, but their approach here is lacking.
Other languages just require a lot more trial and error to get them to do what you want. Rust, if it compiles, generally does what you expected.
It's not just type safety and the borrow checking either, it's the idioms, std lib, and other language design choices that lead on to improved devex in the wider ecosystem as a result.
I understand you can get the same features out of modern C++ now days but it's not just the features, it's everything that comes with it.
They don't want to get into the business of deciding what is and isn't sexual imagery. Instead, it's easier to just ban people and forget about it.
It's the same type of behaviour and attitude that lead to damoore being fired. No room for ambiguity or nuance at Google. Everything can be decided by an algorithm.
It wouldn't take much for Google to turn this around, that's the really screwed up part. All the would have to do to regain trust is come out and admit their system did something wrong and provide recourse for resolution in these cases. Instead they just double down and hope people forget.
I think you're probably right about the spoofing but it comes off a little dismissive when the possibility of a site that queries other sites, could be tricked into doing something it shouldn't, is always going to be in the realm of a possibility.
I joined a larger (tech) company a few years ago, best thing I've ever done. Instead of jumping companies I just jump teams.
Need to be productive to get the team switches but that's not too hard.