flufluflufluffy

It’s not even about “slipping into the wrong hands”… as we can see the super machine capabilities are developing hands of their own

Both can be true but it’s unclear if both are true, and it also depends on what one considers “dumb”

Even if this was simpler and better than markdown, I’d purposefully avoid using it because I hate the name so much. A good rule of thumb I just though of: Do not introduce seafood into your branding if you are not a seafood vendor.

BUTTWIPE MCFART FICTIONAL INTERNET PERSONA

LLAMA 3.2 1B SAYS

MCFART IS A POPULAR INTERNET PERSONALITY KNOWN FOR HIS HUMOROUS CONTENT.

wow how does it konw

The HTTP standard does not define a body for GET requests. Therefore, proxy implementations will typically only copy the data from the request header when sending it off to its next destination. They don’t technically “delete” anything. This saves compute (and possibly bandwidth, if the request happened to have a body, although the whole point is that one can safely assume a GET request does not have a body per the standard).

It is necessarily interpreted. Specific functions or code blocks can be JIT compiled to native code, but not an entire script.

None of those examples are showing something you find wrong with the syntax

amazing

> form submissions and redirects took a while to explain to my colleagues, on account of everyone being used to heavily client-side web applications.

Ah yes, when you have to explain to your esteemed web developer colleagues how the web works xD

We should compile Firefox to wasm, and run Firefox inside Firefox so we can Rust while we Rust

> That means you don't get to see any pure grays -- the closest ones will have bit of blue or yellow tint, depending on the direction of the difference.

OMG I remember as a kid staring at static-y CRT displays, and seeing these faint blue and yellow lines at the borders of them. I’d always wondered why they appeared and why they were specifically blue and yellow. I finally know! (at least, assuming those specific artifacts are due to the same thing)

> There are also other features like Super Heart animated reactions for Stories, custom app icons, customizable fonts for profile bios, and access to additional pins for your profile.

Ahh, remember the days of livejournal/myspace, where we got all of those “features” for free because your profile is literally a fucking webpage

> We remain committed to the private and public sector consensus that AI should not be used for domestic mass surveillance or autonomous weaponry without appropriate human oversight.

And starts the lying to our faces. The public and private (from your own employees!) consensus is that it should not be used for those things at all, regardless of “human oversight.”

Strains are very real and the general concept exists in not only many other farmed plants as well, but domesticated animals, like dogs. All members of the same species, specifically bred for a certain phenotype through manual selection.

Now some people might say that X strain is good for sleep, Y strain is good for anxiety, Z strain is good for creativity, etc… That type of “phenotype” is much harder to quantify and I agree a lot of that type of stuff could be mumbo jumbo, though there could be something to it. But overall high THC strains (more stimulating) vs high CBD strains (more relaxing) have a clear difference.

However flavor is also a big differentiator among strains and that is much more easily quantifiable through the terpene/flavonoid profile, and plain old smelling and tasting. And people have been breeding plants for specific smells and tastes for thousands of years, so it’s not like this is some new concept specific to cannabis.

> We’re not here to talk about picture.

Bro you just spewed 2 long paragraphs about picture at me. Don’t talk to me like that.

If you take their claim that they don’t use vulnerabilities in their products as true, then I don’t see a contradiction. If it isn’t true, then obviously there is a contradiction.

But your considering of all methods that enable fingerprinting as vulnerabilities is your own opinion. There are definitely measurable signals that are based on a user’s behavior, rather than data exposed by the browser itself.

As others have said, a complete dataset for that is basically impossible. You would have to monitor every cell type in an individual from the moment of conception until death. Maybe in a couple hundred years we’ll have nanotech robots that could do that, and our overall morals and ideas of what constitutes ethical research will have changed enough that we allow the creation of such humans with these robots inside them.

This seems so obvious to me. Why would you ever put information regarding a legal case you’re party to into an AI chat

And slowly siphon your personal essence away from yourself and into the model.

Why do you need to ask any AI questions regarding your health every day?

wouldn’t it be “usage based pricing” not “pricing based usage”

I have no idea but when reading the article my mind immediately went to businesses having dashers take photos of competing businesses as some type of weird crowdsourced corporate espionage.

Yeah he literally answered his own question and then used a random excuse for not going with the option.

And here I am thinking if I needed to do that myself I’d just run it on my local machine and upload the final video to wherever it needs to go.

I assume it uses an error tolerant parser, same as most language servers.

Ex: https://github.com/microsoft/tolerant-php-parser/blob/main/d...

Not when your actions don’t align with your professed virtues.

It is public information. The private company whose database is being deleted processed the public information into an easier to search and consume dataset

The data is publicly available. The data being deleted is the private company’s own copy of it.

Should we always send the source of truth to a private company to have it repackaged and presented in a more inoffensive manner?

Who knows? Maybe they are. I’m not from Chad myself (and sounds like you aren’t either), so we’re really not in a position to speculate on that. I do know that it’s quite common for one culture to have values or think in ways that are unintuitive to another culture.