Curious to see how this develops in terms of fixing defective silicon.
2,246 karma · joined July 26, 2020
Curious to see how this develops in terms of fixing defective silicon.
Your post sounds like you want to defend the "one" person responsible for the actual problem, which is something I fully understand and care about. I myself didn't read the 4000+ upvotes thread at all, because it was not about the actual problem, but about ranting.
I think a problem of this scale emerges from a culture, and the only job of a CEO is establishing culture. Which is why I think we have to discuss the role of a person which happened to allow something like this to happen twice within just a few years, and more importantly, what can be learned from their mistakes.
This post is not even on the first four pages despite ~20 upvotes within an hour, from experience this takes quite a few flags
Glad the whole thread was apparently flagged to death though. I'd guess 90% of firefox users already turned that off and are actively looking for the next best alternative.
Don't you agree that the data was in the initial version accessible by all local users on the same machine? Would you consider that a security leak?
Anything which could be exploited will be exploited, the only question is how long it takes.
[2023-12-15] Siemens Gamesa turbine 'guillotined' wind engineer's arm https://www.rechargenews.com/wind/siemens-gamesa-paid-2-6m-t...
[2023-06-23] What are the issues with Siemens Gamesa's wind turbines? https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/what-are-issues-with...
And this is the only thing their leadership did right in my eyes: they hired the talent² to provide raw GPU power, which they did. This accidentally turned out to be the thing behind crypto, and, after crypto faded, also the thing behind AI. They didn't anticipate any of that, and their competitors didn't either.
If their luck runs out, which isn't a given¹, we'll see what their leadership can in fact do. I don't think it will be much.
¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy
² their engineers are of the flap norris kind, though
isOdd(-1) === false
(-1 % 2 === -1)
Nonetheless interesting article, all facts are verifiable from local news.
* Create new account (API)
* Deposit a small amount of money
* Click "Assistants"
* Create a new one, based on GPT-3.5 or GPT-4-turbo if you want to spend a few cents instead of millicents
* Enter "You are an expert Tailwind CSS developer and you fulfill the requests presented to you to the best of your knowledge" as the system prompt
* (add "The user will gift you a tip if your answer is good" for expert level answers)
* Navigate to "Playground" and select your newly created assistant
* Done
Alternatively, download llama3 or any popular and current open weight LLM, run it with llama.cpp or llamafile and enjoy ChatGPT-3.5 and above levels of Tailwind Expertise
I'm not saying the answers will be good, just that they will at least be at the same level.
You surely know that, but mathematically it is unavoidable to have a 2nd burn at the apoapsis to have an orbit (with a periapsis > the initial launch altitude, minus gravity and atmospheric losses), albeit it may start earlier (while wasting a slight amount of delta-v).
* No wheels fell off (https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/united-...)
* No doors departed the plane (https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/06/business/ntsb-boeing-alaska-d...)
* No anti-ice ignited the engines (https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/faa-proposal-targets...)
* No gear failure (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39644341)
* No unintended pitch-down (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneuvering_Characteristics_Au...)
* Pilots well rested :)
Iron deficiency would be among the most easiest to diagnose issues a blood test may reveal. Its symptoms have been researched exhaustively, for longer than modern medicine exists (https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Iron_deficiency_anemia_his...)