Although I believe you can use a digital converter/tuner.
414 karma · joined June 4, 2016
Although I believe you can use a digital converter/tuner.
Here's a quick example with clicker heroes.
http://i.imgur.com/ur5Y2KH.png
And another with swarm simulator.
Not sure why you would go the route of having it predictable?
http://atlcoin.com/atlcoinblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/UF...
In fact TeX is used/preferred over nroff/others for a huge majority of physics/mathematics academic journals. And quite a bit outside of it. [0 - 3]
I will admit for stuff I already know and understand enough of to be considered proficient with it, man pages can be quicker. For something I just installed and still need to learn info pages provide a much better platform.
You may find the following link enjoyable to skim through. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/77514/what-is-gnu-in...
> What you see on the screen (on UNIX, cannot vouch for Linux) when you type `man ls` is an actual professional typesetting system rendering the content for stdout instead of a printing press!
Love the enthusiasm but (La)TeX falls into that description as well.
> That's because you haven't had the opportunity to enjoy SMF.
Maybe, I've put it on my list of things to tinker with more. Thanks for the link.
> That's is quite ironic [...] I am not succumbing to GNU/Linux group think is what one could call disingenuous
I don't care about you succumbing to any group think or whatever other word you can come up with. I am trying to show you why it is actually superior in many ways. Just because you are comfortable with nroff absolutely 100% does not make it better. To put it simply, you may be a professional system/software engineer but if you can't keep up with why these systems are considered (and shown to be) better than what you have now than you will just continue to be frustrated/fall behind.
[0] http://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/submissions.html [1] https://www.overleaf.com/gallery/tagged/academic-journal [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX [3] http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch18s03.html
GDB also works on a large amount of computers. Windows, Linux, netbsd, etc.
>>>However, its use is not strictly limited to the GNU operating system; it is a portable debugger that runs on many Unix-like systems and works for many programming languages, including Ada, C, C++, Objective-C, Free Pascal, Fortran, Java[1] and partially others. [0]
>hmmm, that reminds me an awful lot of Microsoft Windows monoculture.
What? Actually they support windows, which is exactly the opposite of what you are trying to say here... I use GDB DAILY on windows (work.) with zero issues.
I'll agree that perhaps systemd doesn't cover all use cases or wants. But calling it a shoddy copy of SMF with a windows twist is disingenuous. I don't care for the for or against systemd arguments but after the initial reaction/learning phase when pulling away from upstart/sysv/init based shit/etc, many of us are actually starting to warm up to systemd. It handles services wonderfully, it handles logs wonderfully, perhaps it's a bit bloated whatever you can always revert to what you want if you decide to spend the time to actually do it.
>InfiniBand is a different technology than fiberchannel.
Fair enough, i'll have to read up more on it than.
You are making quite a lot of generalizations without doing proper research. If you want to be stuck in your "In the old days us Unix people had it right!" mindset than this discussion is pointless. Otherwise I would love to continue butting heads on this.
What are you even talking about here? man/info works wonderfully, if I want more readable information a terminal sure as hell isn't going to give it to me easier than searching a wiki. And solaris absolutely had problems with documentation on their larger packages.
> lack of backwards compatibility support
Hardly even a real issue if you actually maintain your damn systems more than once every half decade.
>tar -z (tar is a tape archiver, not a compressor!)
... It still is a tape archiver AND a compresser AND a 100 different but completely valid and usable things.
ZFS absolutely is usable.
Why do you enjoy DBX over GDB?
SMF? One would think you would love and embrace systemd.
FibreChannel stack that works? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/InfiniBand
I can't refute all that you have said here since I am not familiar with all of it. But, have you considered you are just doing it the wrong/difficult way?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19444340/how-to-specify-s...
In fact the only text editors that I know of off the top of my head that do not support syntax highlighting is notepad and pico.
Best color scheme I have found, I use it for everything. I can't even imagine opening up some of my code in notepad or vi(m) with no syntax highlighting and actually trying to do a productive amount of work. This suggestion seems absolutely ridiculous if your syntax highlighting is sane.
"Can I download a backup of my humans database?
Yes! Just click "Settings" at the top and you'll be able to download a full backup of your humans."
It also works offline and sync when online again.