ferros

In 20 years somebody will write an article about missing this ‘old’ internet from 2021.

I wonder what they will miss.

Looks like the app’s domain was also seized.

https://www.anom.io/

How good is poker AI these days?

Can the best players still be profitable against computers?

> Production of low-margin processors, such as those used to weigh clothes in a washing machine or toast bread in a smart toaster, has also been hit. While most retailers are still able to get their hands on these products at the moment, they may face issues in the months ahead.

I understand why the new advanced chips could face shortages, but why are there shortages for these basic chips. Can’t they be made anywhere, and more easily?

Have there been any other known cases of similar action around the world?

Let’s say a half filled bottle lasts 4 days in the fridge.

The article doesn’t mention much longer a transfer to a half-sized bottle lasts with very little space for oxygen?

This all feels like you’re getting a false sense of security.

Great, you are reducing your footprint but what remains is undeniably vast.

FYI- there is a summary section at the end of the article if it reads too long for you.

> You can compare the use of alarm clocks to smoking or eating hot dogs.

Wow. That’s a big statement, surely comparing alarms to smoking is a bit much?

That’s an attention grabbing headline number, but what it doesn’t tell you is what would alternatives mean in terms of co2 emissions?

Let’s say we take cement out or drastically reduce it. Where does co2 sit in increased consumption of viable alternatives.

It doesn’t say if he knows the source, and if he declined?

Separating the ARM specific concerns could someone shed light on the generalised apprehension around Nvidia?

My other question is will this make pre-IPO sales fairer?

If historically sales have been over the phone there is the chance people are getting deals based on relationships or priority access.

You could make the case that this will make the process more transparent.

I wonder if this will make it easier to build up larger pre-IPO positions.

Telling somebody else they are wrong about their own personal experience deserves a downvote, which I don't have enough points to give you.

This will leave an enormous black hole in news discovery.

The real question is what new discovery methods will fill this massive hole.

It won’t be newspapers, that’s for sure

Makes sense. Lots depend on Github for CI/CD.

Having your country shut off from Github could break a lot of stuff.

For something that is so central to our day to day lives and our health and well-being, it doesn’t feel like there is enough focus on what goes into our gut.

By that I mean the number of people that test for allergies and intolerance feels low when you consider the potential payoff.

Just knowing that avoiding certain foods your body doesn’t tolerate can massively improve your quality of life if you are indeed intolerant.

YouTube’s unassailable feature is discovery.

Would be great to see competition in video hosting though.

Understand your point, but if I was a customer there is zero chance I am investing a cent with them.

My thinking is if they do this with Citibank and a hundred million, I have no confidence in being able to recover my own money in case of a dispute.

How does a hedge fund decide they want to keep money that’s not theirs and fight it in court?

And they manage people’s money as a business.

Who would entrust these people with their money after learning of this case?

edit: typo.

Yes all of this, how does a regional split work?

Puzzles are a great way to pass that Corona time at home.

I have been wondering what some of these middle managers are doing now that they aren’t inventing work for themselves in the office?

It must be awfully hard to do this from home.

50 percent chance an honest person barred for life.

50 percent chance a criminal gets let through.

If that’s true it’s a wonder the FBI managed to get this far and continues to function.

Get changed after work into different clothes. Even better, get changed for exercise.

I would have thought it would look something like this;

We estimate it has caused 2,2T in damage and are seeking 100B.

They are obviously very smart people and haven’t done it like this for a reason.

Understand, it just adds a sense of unrealism to that case for me.

Everything else looks solid, then after seeing that number, it changes how I see the whole thing.

I wonder what it will take for data security to ever be taken seriously.

Why even declare such an outlandish number?

What’s the difference between saying 2.2T or a gajillion bazillion?