felipellrocha

Have people not lived in those places in the past?

I love how you claim that there doesn’t exist, while at the same time mentioning a (very old) study that would imply an alternative exists so that such study can take place.

If you go to anywhere in Europe you will find plenty of places that prove the opposite.

It is, yeah. Which is why when you compile 99/100 times it just works. I don’t think people understand that this is one of Rust’s best features.

This is a huge mischaracterization. Most people in the roman empire were free. Yes, they had slaves, but their economy was not based in slavery. In fact, part of the reforms of Diocletian was to transform everyone into serfs, aka, proto-Feudalism. They walked backwards, not forward.

H... House...? Is that you?

This makes sense to me. To some people, nothing will be sufficient outside of free. The demand curve predicts this. What is weird is that they're talking as if the problem was with every company trying to get paid (paying the bills? that's for the weak), instead of just simply recognizing that their purchasing power is relatively low.

...were they not required to do that before...?

> The matter is, none of the languages, especially the so-called “C++ killers” give any real advantage over C++ in the modern world.

To you. There are pleeenty of people who want to write performant code in a safe manner.

I’d say it’s solved if you want a garbage collector. If you don’t, then there is plenty of room for innovation

Heeeere we go

I've heard so many people claim this, but I've never seen this put into practice in production, and at scale.

I don't even think that that proves that this cannot be done... And I've seen A LOT of people try. But, things invariably start to break down, and at this point I just think that the statement above is more wishy washy than anything, though I want to believe...

Funny enough, i never noticed that english feature because PT-BR is similar, we only use Voce instead of Tu.

It’s make all the way down

I can believe this was written in earnest, but in the earnest of someone who doesn't really understand how to build product, or (which would be worse) someone with standards so high they would never release anything (a profile I have seen many times in my life). So, I can't really take it as valid criticism, since none of it reads as useful, or even valid criticism.

He is receptive? Daaaaang... I'll see myself out...

When you watch Survivor (yes, the tv show), sometimes a player does a bad play, gets publicly caught, and has to go on a "I'm sorry" tour the next days. Came to mind after reading this tweet. He is not sorry for what he's done. He is sorry for getting caught.

Who would invest in Ilya, though, when he very publicly tried to oust one of his oldest allies and failed? Trust can’t be built that way

This is a terrible take. Ilya staying is the only thing that is basically guaranteed. Everything else isn’t. In addition, no one is irreplaceable.

Can’t blame them for trying

Came here to say the same thing, but a lot more angrily and a lot less eloquently. Thanks!

> I think I might be the only one on the planet that tries to avoid tooling like this that's tied to a subscription

I think it depends on the app. If it's something that I use frequently I want a subscription. Otherwise, not. The reason for that, is that I look at subscriptions as something I have to be convinced to continuously pay every month. That gives me a lot of power to just disconnect at a later time, and this means that those apps tend to listen to user feedback more often than other apps.

Couldn’t you spin N workers and assign work to them?

That is usually the case in Rust. One mostly deals with lifetimes in library code

So... Hsh?

I don’t know how you are coming up with this take. Everyone that i know in the industry, big or small, calculated their fees with the faq open next to them so they wouldn’t make a mistake. Everyone would have owed more to Unity. A few owed more to Unity than they had in the bank.

Take the browser. It gets an incredible amount of performance out people’s devices even though 99% of javascript is bound to a single thread. The way they accomplish that is via their asynchronous architecture. So, not always.

That one will do it. I guess this is when i leave twitter

I would say ledger is more about knowing where your money is going, and ghostfolio is about making sure you minimize the risk of losing said money all at once after you hit a certain wealth threshold

Rust has simd support, so maybe the latter is the issue.

Oh, god. Way too many...!