Thanks for the reminder.
118 karma · joined October 12, 2020
Thanks for the reminder.
This had me thinking, how are they going to get "clout", by comparing AI spending?
One small improvement, show the return values, not just the result, and somehow visualize if the function has not yet returned.
Maybe it's just because I'm used to debuggeres, but the vertical arrangement of variables and their values seems weird.
I've seen Spark clusters being replaced by a single container using less than 1 CPU core and few 100s MB of RAM.
Tomatoes can improve substantially if left without refrigeration, it's one of those fruits that continues to ripen after being picked.
An retailer website is not the same as a trading platform, the same way that a house is not the same as a railway station. But we blindly try to apply the same "good practices" everywhere.
We also have another interesting phenomenon, our products can mutate in their lifetime, and our practices should follow (they often don't) an MVP can become a critical system, a small internal project can become a client-facing application, we can re-platform, re-write, etc. That's very rare in other industries.
But... Black coffee for me.
When you ask git for a diff it compares the trees and when there is a difference it compares the files the trees reference and it shows you a diff.
Git does not store diffs, it stores file trees.
Not everything has to be cost-optimized some things can be just for pleasure or for the peace of having something available when needed.
What I do think is that for a lot of people many of these purchases are just a default path to follow.