41 karma · joined June 27, 2012
Isn't this the key?
If AI can learn how to write a song like the Beatles, is it a crime that it has learnt it, or is it a crime that someone can use AI to produce work that resembles those artists' creations?
May the control be put on preventing AI from plagiarizing instead of putting measures to prevent scraping specific content from the open web.
Is there a way to revert to the older versions of the software?
Is that a fact? That seems insanely large.
I remember reading an article along these lines a few years ago when arguing against using https absolutely everywhere.
Here is the correct one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY7DtKMBxBw
In my experience, upper management with enough years in the business do not feign as much authority in understanding how IT works. On the contrary IT people who have been with the business long enough seem to think they understand the business pretty well. They don't. And half knowledge is dangerous is indeed a wise saying.
So even though those system architects buzzing with their confidence due to years of being part of the business often provide helpful insight, i would always always run crucial decisions that effect the business functionally, by business people only.
- your main business is not IT
- your IT dept is under pressure to do a lot with very little
- your tech debt grows and grows until it becomes actually apparent to the business that even small changes are taking tremendous effort
- your IT team is not just stuck with legacy code but also with legacy skills
- someone has the sense to measure your IT throughput
- "expert" IT consultants are called in
- experts call for a total overhaul using some fancy terminology
- some $$$ later we have a n% transformation, some unhappy permanent employees who think they could have done this themselves, reluctantly acquired knowledge, skeptical internal users
- you now learnt the hard way to listen to your IT team more when they say that they need support with learning new skills and time to fix tech debt
whenever i'm thoughtful on the 'meta-humor' discussion, i'm reminded of this scene, because it seems like strong reminder of people's perception of a lighter vein in a scenario in contrast to a puppy's ignorance thereof.
Even today evening I was thinking of just this.
Your experience has inspired me even more. I believe i must stop thinking and just plan go at the next best available free time.
I'm gonna read ur subscription. Like them. And probably subscribe to them :)
http://ipmsg.org/index.html.en (For Windows)
http://ishwt.net/en/software/ipmsg/ (For Mac)
On contrary, for me this one was one of the strongest predictions. In my opinion, predictions should be taken in spirit and not by letter. Looking at the rise of Clojure, i dare say that was a great foresight.
I think it becomes all the more important to talk about weapons when you have a mentally inflicted person in your family.
> methodically collected all the sharp objects in the house into a single Tupperware container that now travels with me
This is exactly what i'm talking about.
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9...
This is an article i just read after reading this post. According to it: Lanza's mother was a big fan of guns. And taught her son how to shoot. And they had lot of weaponry at home.
I do not know of mental history of Lanza. Assuming if there was a bad side to it, it is obviously very inconsiderate to have such a child being introduced or even be in periphery of any kind of weaponry.
> God help me. God help Michael. God help us all.
Amen. Also, in retrospect, it is really important to regulate access to weapons, especially in a case where there is a bad mental history.
so folks, its not yet sold out. you might wanna try to grab it again if you had failed to some while ago.