Lots of people swear by winamp.
547 karma · joined January 14, 2010
eric@ewams.net
Lots of people swear by winamp.
Curious about the dev kit. You mention that Sega provided sample code and there was at least one other dev platform, did Sega provide support and good documentation or did you always basically have to figure everything out for yourself? Is this true for other vendors (ie, Nintendo, Sony and now MSFT)?
Thanks for responding folks.
For you example, say I exercise my option to by 1 at strike price of $100 in 2015. I hold on to it and sell it in 2017 for the FMV of $1000. Do you only pay the capital gains tax of the $900 gain?
Ignore state rules, just at the fed.
http://www.coca-colacompany.com/ekocenter/ekocenter-empoweri...
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/pure-genius-how-dean-k...
9:2 A Sermon on Newton and Turing
9:3 Globalstar Satellite Communications
9:4 Keenly Spraying the Kernel Pools
9:5 The Second Underhanded Crypto Contest
9:6 Cross VM Communications
9:7 Antivirus Tumors
9:8 A Recipe for TCP/IPA
9:9 Mischief with AX.25 and APRS
9:10 Napravi i ti Raˇcunar „Galaksija“
9:11 Root Rights are a Grrl’s Best Friend!
9:12 What If You Could Listen to This PDF?
9:13 Oona’s Puzzle Corner!
Backdoors from Compiler Bugs
A Protocol for Leibowitz
Reprogramming a Mouse Jiggler
Exploiting an Academic Hypervisor
Weaponized Polyglots as Browser Exploits
On Error Resume Next for Unix
Sing Along with Toni Brixton
Backdooring Nothing-Up-My-Sleeve Numbers
Building a Wireless CTF
Grammatically Correct Encryption
"Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment, including devices that interfere with cellular and Personal Communication Services (PCS), police radar, Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and wireless networking services (Wi-Fi)."
If that disconnect is disabling wifi aps then technically it is "intefering" with wifi services and thus illegal?
With virtualization you have the hypervisor that has applications running along with it (ie: ssh, a cli, syslog, bash etc) and then you install a guest in a VM on top of the hypervisor. The OS on the VM is another vector which has applications on it (DB, web, ftp, etc).
If I have a bare metal server with just an OS installed on it and its applications on top of that, I only have to worry about that set of OS and applications and their associated risk vectors.
If I have a bare metal server with a hypervisor and then the above OS and set of applications, I have increased the number of risk vectors by however many applications are running along with the hypervisor.
“but do people actually believe that it makes it less secure?”
Just bringing a hypervisor into an environment does not of itself immediately make it less secure. I agree with you, I don’t think it makes it less secure. It does increase the risk of the environment and appropriate architecture and action must be taken to prevent your statement from being true. A large number of environments do not architect and manage properly.
Another very realistic, and happening today, example: Bare metal server with Windows OS installed. Bare metal server with a hypervisor which just happens to have bash on it (or is susceptible to this memory issue). The same Windows OS is installed as a VM. In the second instance with the hypervisor I would have, indirectly and out of my immediate control, made my environment less secure.
An increase in complexity or increase in components will increase the risk of an environment.
DoD approved for more than a year:
Related Topic Info: http://www.fcc.gov/guides/open-internet
The security assessment is for the Windows version of TrueCrypt only. Which also answers your question, TrueCrypt is appealing because it works on *nix, BSD, and Windows. It is also free and open source. The Windows version is easy to use, has a nice GUI and actually works as stated.