49 karma · joined September 6, 2017
In my experience (in academia) most informaticians are focused on the data whereas my focus is software development in support of the informaticians’ goals.
Take a look at some Universities that have Biomedical Informatics departments; I started with a University that has such a department. They’ll typically have faculty that have grant-funded projects that require a software component, whether it’s NLP, AI, ML or application development for various purposes (including clinical-use software).
Also look for organizations or companies working with HL7 standards (most recent tech is FHIR (http://hl7.org/fhir/)).
I’ve worked in Biomedical Informatics for the past 12 years, but as a software engineer. My original experience was not even close to this field.
You can certainly pursue a degree—yes, likely PhD. Or you can use your SWE background to enter the field. There is a learning curve to understand the domain, but that’s what we do as software types.
I have a Peruvian friend who had a similar experience. He would relate that when you would ask someone in his country how they’re doing, it was expected that that would be the beginning of a (possibly brief, but probably not so brief) discussion.
It's likely insurance companies will push laws making it a requirement in order to provide insurance services. (At the moment, they just ask you to install their devices in exchange for a "lower premium.")
I can see this. The two big vendors are pushing their own cloud. One slip-up on their end will do it.
This becomes even more plausible now that third-party access is required to be supported. It's becoming easier for these third-parties to slurp up as much patient data as they can. Data from health systems will become much more vulnerable to exploit and the possibility of having all patient data exposed is increased. Likely worse than Equifax and/or Cambridge Analytica.
It's an experience being a parent of an autistic child, but I wouldn't trade it. Certainly something to be grateful for.
Bear in mind these hobbies/projects may not be in your area of interest--in fact, your children will probably guide what you focus on (just don't force them to be interested in what you're interested in). Regardless of the subject, you can make it interesting to yourself.
Once they're grown, you'll have plenty of time to pursue your own interests, and if you're lucky one of your children just might follow in your footsteps.
Mostly your children will grow to love the time you spent with them and you'll be grateful for it when you look back. They'll be happy memories.
From this (and I agree with what is quoted below, as I'm in that group of folks who studied one thing and am now performing a different job):
https://www.delltechnologies.com/content/dam/delltechnologie...
Not only will workers have many jobs, the tasks and duties of the jobs they’ll perform will be markedly different from what they studied. The experts that attended the IFTF workshop in March 2017 estimated that around 85% of the jobs that today’s learners will be doing in 2030 haven’t been invented yet. This makes the famous prediction that 65% of grade school kids from 1999 will end up in jobs that haven’t yet been created seem conservative in comparison.
Also from WEForum:
http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/chapter-1-the...
https://publicutilities.utah.gov
I've reported to them in the past for things Qwest did. Seemed to be effective.
With regards to personal, for starters look at: - fee schedule - balance requirements, including penalties for balances that do not meet those requirements - online access/services/security
Then maybe you might be interested in the services they provide (debit, credit card and how much interest they charge, auto loan, mortgage, etc.)
One section of the route is wide enough, but iirc, the residents along this particular segment in Provo fought against the dedicated lane (and won, afaik).
One approach is to try software in academia. Look for departments that need web developers, and once there see about branching out into other areas (they often like folks who are willing to learn new things that can be applied in their domain).
In addition to the ability to branch out, you'll likely have the opportunity as FT staff to pursue a degree at reduced tuition (depending on the university/college).
It's often the case that you take an income hit in academia (which is often a reason they're willing to hire anyone with relevant experience), but the learning experience can be beneficial.
Of course, I could be generalizing my experience.
Just a thought.
https://www.amazon.com/Party-Secret-Chinas-Communist-Rulers/...
Edit: Then I cross my fingers hoping there isn't a breakage or unexpected behavior somewhere.