988 karma · joined April 24, 2014
> "Write 1,000 words about it"
> "you are writing the definitive 1,000 words for this photo. Make them count."
> "Does it have to be 1,000 words? Yes...Your entry must be exactly 1,000 words"
It also says that the prize is $1,000, and there's 1 picture - but I haven't seen anyone asking whether each of those is an upper or lower bound!
Nope that's a 0.1kilometerstone.
I'm usually fairly forgiving about it and like to err on the side of being generous to the individual but in this case it seemed very clear to me and got in the way of the message. I noticed the .de domain and wondered whether it might be AI translation, But I don't think it was, and in my experience, AI translation doesn't give the same uncanny valley vibes.
This is totally lost on me.
> As judges, the professors then completed 2,918 blinded, forced-choice comparisons (median per judge: 200), each time indicating which of the two anonymized responses, from the instructor or the LLM, they would rather give to a student
Is this a horrible sideswipe or do people think it was intended frankly?
Might try explaining it this way?
It works the same way as a postal address. The first part before `/` is the envelope: by analogy it runs streetaddress.city.country.
You can give a name to your house, or add an apartment to the front - but that doesn't change the most significant part.
Input:
happy birthday. Did you get any nice presents? It's nice to see you.
Output: Another year decays!
Darkness falls upon your day!
What offerings did you seize from the void?
The ritual of your birth is complete!
I behold your face once more!
YEAH! most searched:
69 29504 searches
67 13640 searches
edit: ...presumably due to the HN effect, 69 has jumped up to ~33k while 67 stagnates at ~13k!In my opinion the best measure of exercise is perceived effort. So while you're asking for objective answers, I think a lot of this is inherently subjective.
The benchmark you're asking for is also ill-defined. For example: How frequently to be as effective as what type and what frequency of therapy?
In fact, the words are etymologically linked, they’re really just the same word! See https://www.etymonline.com/word/knit
> knit(v.)
> Old English cnyttan "to tie with a knot, bind together, fasten by tying," related to Old Norse knytja "bind together, form into a knot," Middle Low German knütten "to tie, knot," Old English cnotta "a knot," from Proto-Germanic knuttjan, from stem knutt-. Of brows, late 14c. Intransitive meaning "do knitting, weave by looping or knotting a continuous thread" (especially in reference to plain stitch) is from 1520s.