242 karma · joined October 8, 2013
As if access to opportunities has nothing to do with race.
But PACER charges 10 cents per page for access and I don't have a problem with that. These fees keep the federal courts open to do vital business when Congress decides it's a good time for a shutdown. Any complaints re: PACER fees should be directed to Congress.
* MS VB Macros for automating how my documents look and what they do
* Basic sync scripts that sync folders locally > server and vice versa
* An app to keep track of the my frequently used rules: trial rules dot com
* A website to keep track of various developments in my area law [internal to my firm]
* A PDF app that automates basic tasks [batestamping, adding exhibit stickers, etc]
Edit for spelling/formatting.
Setting aside the sensational headline, this seems a reasonable result. According to the article, the hospitalist who did not see the patient decided to (a) opine that her symptoms were due to some other, incorrect cause; and (b) override the decision of the doctor who actually saw the patient. Why shouldn't this individual have accountability for the harm that he caused? He wants to make life or death decisions without so much as examining the patient and he doesn't want to be held responsible for those decisions. How is that fair?
As an aside, I also enjoy the quick access to emojis.