Oh, nevermind on #2 then. Sounds like they've been doing a lot of feature development.
396 karma · joined January 12, 2015
1. Not designed from the ground-up to prevent data loss. Has had data-loss issues in the past.
<strikethrough>2. An electron app that doesn't let you open multiple documents at once. (edit: nevermind, seems like they did lots of feature development here)</strikethrough>
That said, I don't know of any other good local-first outliners (i.e. like Workflowy).
e.g. A hole made by a hole punch (cause), for fitting into a 3-ring binder (telos). Done.
Information wants to be free! ACAB! Eat the police!
[1]: https://www.haskell.org/hugs/pages/users_guide/implicit-para...
Could the file be split to retroactively fix everyone doing this?
It's fully intentional.
No it's not, it's just rare that you'd have the ability to inject CSS but not JS.
A core skill of hacking is being able to see through the things people would normally see as "hassle" or "friction" to the reductionist "what keys do I have to press on the machine in what order to make this happen".
The competition and test set will still have hidden biases due to the ontology you use.
Sufficient optimization pressure always eventually overcomes your bias control metrics, in the context of actual utility rather than other metrics.
It's well known in cryptography and security that all abstractions are leaky.
who cares how much it costs? who cares if ethereum itself wins or it gets replaced by something new? the value to humanity is in the research
.... so it was a lie?
> “If these figures are accurate, HD Smith supplied this pharmacy with nearly five times the amount a rural pharmacy would be expected to receive,”
So it's normal to supply 1124 pills per capita&year to rural pharmacies? Something seems strange about these two pieces of information...
This is not actually possible, there could have been an issue with your threat model. e.g. side-channel attacks could be out of scope.
I found it very useful for buying cyproterone acetate online as it's not available in my country.
Also there's stuff that's not even illegal, like kink, but for which credit card companies refuse to allow related transactions because of respectability politics or too much fraud.
In the context of a bug-bounty program, it's not malicious to "harm the reputation" of the entity in question, it's malicious to attempt to profit off the hack itself.
> The author wanted to sign the papers, take the money, and advertise the hack.
Of course! It's part of their portfolio.
It's common for security researchers to share details of a hack once it's been fixed. It's not "malicious" to tell the truth.
yet