HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

emilstahl

71 karma · joined April 27, 2015

Cyber Security Engineer

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/emilstahl; my proof: https://keybase.io/emilstahl/sigs/5SedDawAyH5zoveqsONIHGb-_LzKqS45gPZu4SfuuKs ]

submissionscomments
emilstahl··on Ask HN: Politics Blog Cloudflare Subpoena
Keep in mind that your registant details of your .com domain might also be disclosed.

Your domain is at Tucows:

>Tucows Privacy Policy prohibits the release of registrant information without express permission from the registrant except under limited circumstances such as when necessary to comply with ICANN’s Whois publication requirements or when required to comply with law or legal process properly served on Tucows or one of its affiliates.

https://tucowsdomains.com/help/legal-submissions/tucows-inc-...

emilstahl··on Ask HN: Politics Blog Cloudflare Subpoena
Since the post have been taken down and the URL now returns 404, here is an archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20240527214609/https://debunking...
emilstahl··on Ask HN: Politics Blog Cloudflare Subpoena
You do realize that your ISP/host/transit provider also complies with subpoenas and court orders, right? This doesn’t change anything.
emilstahl··on Ask HN: Politics Blog Cloudflare Subpoena
Cloudflare is not that much different:

>Cloudflare requires valid legal process such as a subpoena or a foreign government equivalent of a subpoena before providing this type of information to either foreign or domestic government authorities or civil litigants.

https://www.cloudflare.com/transparency/

>It is our policy to notify our customers of a subpoena or other legal process requesting their customer or billing information before disclosure of information, whether that legal process comes from the government or private parties involved in civil litigation, unless legally prohibited.

https://cf-assets.www.cloudflare.com/slt3lc6tev37/6g60HDCGGk...

emilstahl··on Ask HN: Politics Blog Cloudflare Subpoena
No, Cloudflare is not acting inappropriately at all.

This is standard industry practice, not just in the U.S., but also in Europe and the UK.

Hosting providers, telcos, social media platforms, and other similar entities generally comply with court orders or subpoenas directed at their customers.

It’s uncommon for these companies to challenge such orders unless there’s a very compelling legal reason to do so - i.e. some crazy demand.

emilstahl··on Level 3 Global Outage
CenturyLink/Level3 on Twitter: "We are able to confirm that all services impacted by today’s IP outage have been restored. We understand how important these services are to our customers, and we sincerely apologize for the impact this outage caused."

https://twitter.com/CenturyLink/status/1300089110858797063

emilstahl··on Level 3 Global Outage
CNN just blames Cloudflare.. :facepalm: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/30/tech/internet-outage-clou...
emilstahl··on Level 3 Global Outage
Source?
emilstahl··on Level 3 Global Outage
Cloudflare status page: Update - Major transit providers are taking action to work around the network that is experiencing issues and affecting global traffic.

We are applying corrective action in our data centers as the situation changes in order to improve reachability Aug 30, 14:26 UTC

https://www.cloudflarestatus.com

emilstahl··on Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare
“AS396531 "Allegheny Technologies Incorporated" is leaking a better-reachable route for AS13335 "Cloudflare, Inc." towards AS701 "Verizon Business/UUnet" explaining the current LSE going on.”

https://twitter.com/OhNoItsFusl/status/1143117619106652160