emilfihlman

Posted as link because of the length limit.

Has anyone else ran into this?

Does anyone know how authority on passing these kinds of rules go, and if they are enforceable?

Is there some state/federal law that delegates power over some things to the municipalities/cities/counties etc that allow them passing ordnance like this?

It feels weird to me that this would not be a state / federal level decision, but maybe that's just my Finnish ass.

What annoys me about LLMs is that they don't do fact based pushback and form cohesive implementation idea when proceeding.

Like for example if you think there's a possible problem, say that if there's a problem and suggest a workaround, the agent will change direction and implementation to that, even though there never was a problem.

Except you are missing an important aspect: the model includes training data that responds to THIS IS FUCKING WRONG, after which highly likely follows correction patterns and working solutions.

Ie, actually, yes, shouting at the AI can (and does, there are papers on this), work.

Is this what it feels like using Claude?

Holy shit this was the most infuriating thing I've experienced in a while lmao, I felt so relieved when the button was turned to blue, but then so visceral "no no no no no" panic when it turned to the gradient.

Amazing

E: this is a horror simulator, my breathing is becoming shallow and fast, I love it.

Cool innovation (actually is good and cool).

Do it after you have actually made the rust version work the same as the C version.

Insane to be adding complexity, breaking compatibility and introducing new bugs to software that needs to function correctly.

You are very much mistaken.

Chatgpt can absolutely do the things here: it can give you files, it can integrate and show web pages that you develop, etc.

There is no need for an "agent", the chat version works just fine and is actually easier for novices.

>therefore lacks any guard rails you'd expect in a programming language

This is simply not true. Guardrails are enforced by the compiler, and both gcc and clang have a myriad of flags to make C safe, not to mention Fil-C.

From another comment: https://github.com/demo-zexuan/liang-wenfeng-investor-meetin...

I'm quite willing to bet it can be done in this era of enabling developers with slob, which still usually works.

Until this bug is fixed, there's no trusting Bun

This is also not a memory issue but an actual logic issue, so Rust doesn't help there.

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/14144

I hope they fixed the models in that they don't interrupt and jump in and that you can order them to be silent. Previous model could not be silent and always cut me off and spoke over me.

I would just like to point to a single issue that has major ramifications in using Bun:

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/14144

I have no vpn on my part.

Yeah I would definitely hit no. Should have collected network information while it happened.

What was also interesting is that it prompted me to select a certificate that was definitely not for that page, ie. it accepted any and all certs, not just ones that are for a certain page (I have incus web generated certificates that should be only for that domain and page, which definitely have nothing to do with Google).

It's akin to an SCP infohazard or memetics.

The way llms are right now, and the way humans are, there is no side channel.

It's all about training, but even with extensive training, output breaks down if it's probability based and not hard logic and state machine.

Any text generation model can easily be made to support tool calls.

It reduces their credibility if they misrepresent the story.

Yes I agree that it's quite silly, of course if we assume they acted in a reasonable way (which I can't say for certain if the security had to result to forcefully ejecting them).

It very badly damages credibility to misrepresent what happened. It doesn't further the cause, only damages it.

>“They were respectfully given the opportunity to cease this behavior and chose not to which is why they were escorted out.”

I understand the want to protest, but you do know that misrepresentation doesn't help, right?

Refusing to cease by an even organisers order will, yes, result in being escorted out forcefully by security.

Actually, maybe you are correct and I should.

Civil servant's info is public information (at least in Finland it is).

It's good that bureaucrats can't hide behind bureaucracy.

>They are not the ones with the power to decide what happens

This is a very naive interpretation. Bureaucrats have MASSIVE amount of power and control, and in actuality decide many things and how the law is written.

Same. Without that I could remove all npm dependence, which would greatly improve security.

Because it entirely removes dependency for external libraries and package repositories, like npm, for basic internet interoperability.

I (also) basically use only one package: ws.

It's so sad that node refuses to add websocket server support.

Adding websocket would simplify stuff tremendously, as well as make deployments much, much more secure.

I very much don't think this blog post passes any sniff test for anything to be taken seriously or given much thought, it's just political agenda posting.

However, there is an interesting question on how presidential physical and mental fitness is evaluated. Does anyone have insight into what rules and regulations govern this and do they have any (preferably supreme court validated) backing?

Rust is a passing faux, safe C will just overtake it.

It's awful as a library, mediocre as an event space and not really good as a hacker space.

It's beautiful, though, but that's about it.

t. a Finn

As a Finn this data allowance is pretty funny to me (though of course not unknown). Here most subscriptions are unlimited.