878 karma · joined September 6, 2025
1. “Writing with AI Can Reduce Gender Bias in Hiring Evaluations” Alicia T. H. Liu, Mina Lee, and Xuechunzi Bai.
2. “‘It Didn’t Feel Right but I Needed a Job so Desperately’: Understanding People’s Emotions & Help Needs During Financial Scams” Jake Chanenson, Tara Matthews, Sunny Consolvo, Patrick Gage Kelley, Jessica McClearn, Sarah Meiklejohn, Abhishek Roy, Renee Shelby, Kurt Thomas, and Amelia Hassoun.
3. “How Does My Time Use Align With My Values? Personal Informatics for Connecting Abstract Values to Everyday Life” Michael J. Hoefer, Raegan Rychecky, and Stephen Voida.
4. “Participatory, Not Punitive: Student-Driven AI Policy Recommendations in a Design Classroom” Kaoru Seki, Manisha Vijay, and Yasmine Kotturi.
The ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems is the leading international conference on Human-Computer Interaction. CHI 2026 will take [SIC] place in Barcelona.
A secure system is impenetrable unless you have the key.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constraint_satisfaction_proble...
Don’t be fooled by this summer of AI hype
Given arbitrarily large context window.
Well, the current conjecture is that it hasn't to do with coloring at all, but how many, on a map (partitioning of plane into connected regions), regions can pairwise touch: 4.
(That is: If someone proves Hadwiger's conjecture, then the four colour theorem follows.)
For whom? Surely the authors can find an hour after submitting the paper to a journal?
Beware that a reviewer easily spend a full week on reviewing a paper, and there are typically three of them. So if one hour of conversation can save three weeks work, it sounds worth it.
Something like 300Bn tokens, something in the vicinity of USD 10M.
Now, you can't conduct experiments using the default model?
n! < exp(n log n)
PhD has nothing to do with expertness.
If you have a PhD, you have completed some kind of research training.
That's all there is. Says nothing about knowledge or whether or not you're a genius.
You cannot conclude anything else, and nobody claims that you can.
If someone has a PhD, they have some training in doing research.
There simply is no contender to LaTeX and PDFs.
Lucky for you, almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render.
In my country, that's exactly how it is.
Yes, you need to have a thesis to defend, but ultimately it all comes down to the (oral and live) defense/disputation.