10,499 karma · joined August 27, 2018
contact me for mentorship, training or project work opportunities:
embee+hn at societyserver dot net
and if you want my personal opinion, anyone who feels crying babies are disruptive is an asshole. i am not saying that lightly. parents are not just flying for fun and letting their babies cry to torture you.
as a society we need to be more child friendly and supportive of parents. especially when they have a baby in distress. this whole idea that children should always be quiet and never bother adults is absurd, and only really found in western culture. that doesn't mean kids should be allowed to get away with anything, but a crying baby is not something that can just be stopped until the parents can identify the cause, and we should have some tolerance for that.
and as european i can also tell you that i am most certainly more likely to talk to someone in manhattan than i would in a european city for example.
on the other hand, in this young age physical development between boys and girls can be very different. so maybe separation is necessary because of that.
it's a long road to get there. but it's the only way that is going to work.
you could of course pay them more, and everything would become more expensive. might work. but i bet you don't want that either.
and, i believe i read somewhere that this is not an inability to stabilize the API but a conscious decision to not promise a stable API expressly because it creates the effect i described.
zfs is shunned. can't really get around that copyright issue. bcachefs just hit a setback, which i am hopeful will eventually be resolved.
but i disagree. even in the past those rich people had to maintain their wealth, so a lot of what they did was economically necessary.
so i don't think that the economics of work will go away. it will change, but not vanish.
there is a lot of work that should never be replaced by machines. raising children for example, but also caring for the sick, elderly and disabled. yes, some of it will be machine assisted. those will be machines that increase the independence of people. also art and entertainment, while it may use machines for assistance should remain firm in human hands. also government, laws, jurisprudence. science, research, tourism, etc...
much of it can be done machine assisted, but the human touch is not optional, and a good part of that work is still something that people may not want to do without some sort of reward.
today economic benefits are the reward for humans making an effort. in the past it may have been social status, but i don't think it is a good idea to go back to that. social status is what gives rise to prejudice and racism.
work will not go away. the economic necessity for everyone to work just to put food on the table, that may go away, but the need to motivate people to do work that machines can't do on their own will remain.
therefore what changes is the motivation. today people are motivated to study and work because they need an income. in a world where income is not strictly necessary society needs to make an effort to motivate the future generation to study and work on things we still need despite that.
money is the most egalitarian way to motivate people to do work that is hard but needs to be done. everything else brings us back to status and class, which is not what we want.